Write your message
Volume 8, Issue 2 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)                   Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(2): 72-82 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shakari M, Shabani Bahar G, Solimani M. The Effect of Organizational Architecture on Performance Management with the Mediating role of Organizational Agility of Physical Education Departments of Medical Sciences Universities in the Country. Iran J Ergon 2020; 8 (2) :72-82
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-733-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Sport Management, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran , m_shekari82@yahoo.com
2- Department of Sport Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Sport Sciences, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
Abstract:   (5273 Views)

Background and aim: Nowadays performance management is used to make organizational agility and improve organizational architecture. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of organizational architecture on performance management with the mediating role of organizational agility of physical education departments of country's medical science universities.
Methods: The method is a descriptive-survey research and operational and applied in terms of purpose. The statistics of this study included all senior managers and staff of physical education departments in medical universities throughout Iran, selected as a statistical sample for a total of 216. Data collection tools were organizational architecture questionnaire, Baldrige performance standard questionnaire and Sharifi organizational agility questionnaire. In order to analyze the research findings, path analysis and structural equations and SPSS 20  were used.
Results: It showed that organizational architecture and its dimensions have a significant effect on performance management with the mediating role of organizational agility of physical education departments in medical universities of the country. The magnitude of the effect of the mediating variable using VAF was 0.228 and according to the magnitude of the direct effect of the independent variable on the dependent which was equal to 0.799, it can be said that the magnitude of the direct effect is greater than the indirect effect.
Conclusion: In modern performance management, the aims of staffs and the purposes of the organization should be aligned and by creating coordination and providing the necessary guidance by supervisors, people feel more belonging to the organization and make the organization more agile by organizational changes.

Full-Text [PDF 436 kb]   (6162 Downloads) |   |   Extended Abstract (HTML)  (1192 Views)  
In modern performance management, the aims of staffs and the purposes of the organization should be aligned and by creating coordination and providing the necessary guidance by supervisors, people feel more belonging to the organization and make the organization more agile by organizational changes.
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2020/07/6 | Accepted: 2020/08/25 | ePublished: 2020/08/25

References
1. Zeng YR, Wang L, Xu XH. An integrated model to select an ERP system for Chinese small-and medium-sized enterprise under uncertainty. Tech Econ Dev Eco. 2017; 23(1):38-58. [DOI:10.3846/20294913.2015.1072748]
2. Seethamraju R, Sundar DK. Influence of ERP systems on business process agility. IIMB Manag Rev. 2013; 25(3):137-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.iimb.2013.05.001]
3. Kim PS, Hong KP. Major constraints and possible solutions for performance management in Korea. Public Manag Rev. 2013; 15(8):1137-53. [DOI:10.1080/14719037.2013.818844]
4. Jamali DR, El Dirani AM, Harwood IA. Exploring human resource management roles in corporate social responsibility: The CSR‐HRM co‐creation model. Business Eth: Euro Rev. 2015; 24(2):125-43. [DOI:10.1111/beer.12085]
5. Manistitya M, Fongsuwan W. Human Resource Management, Job Satisfaction and Employee Commitment Affecting Information Technology Staff Turnover Intention: A Structural Equation Model. Res J Business Manag. 2015; 9(1):157-72. [DOI:10.3923/rjbm.2015.157.172]
6. Yan M, Yu Y, Dong X. Contributive roles of multilevel organizational learning for the evolution of organizational ambidexterity. Inf Tech People; 2016. [DOI:10.1108/ITP-04-2015-0079]
7. Silverman LL. Organizational Architecture-A Framework for Successful Transformation. Anchorage: Partners for Progress; 1997.
8. Oveyssi S. The role of organizational architecture and evaluation of the framework of federal organizational architecture in e-government in order to improve strategic management. International Conference on Research in Engineering, Science and Technology. 28 July; Tehran, Iran; 2016. [Google Scholar]
9. Armstrong M, Taylor S. Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice: London: Kogan Page Publishers; 2020. [Google Scholar]
10. Dries N, Vantilborgh T, Pepermans R. The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential employees. Personnel Rev; 2012. [DOI:10.1108/00483481211212977]
11. Sharifi H, Zhang Z. A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction. Int J Prod Eco. 1999; 62(1-2):7-22. [DOI:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00217-5]
12. Chen WH, Chiang AH. Network agility as a trigger for enhancing firm performance: A case study of a high-tech firm implementing the mixed channel strategy. Indust Market Manag. 2011; 40(4):643-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.01.001]
13. Hiiemäe J. Developing a model of employee's performance management process for Tallinn hotel businesses. BA thesis. Helsinki: Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences. [Article] [Google Scholar]
14. Felipe CM, Roldán JL, Leal-Rodríguez AL. An explanatory and predictive model for organizational agility. J Bus Res. 2016; 69(10):4624-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.014]
15. Zachman JA. A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Sys J. 1987; 26(3):276. [DOI:10.1147/sj.263.0276]
16. Lepak DP, Snell SA. Virtual HR: Strategic Human Resource Management in the 21st Century. Human Resource Manag Rev. 2007; 8(3):215-34. [DOI:10.1016/S1053-4822(98)90003-1]
17. Mohammadi M, Hoshangi H, Hashemieh M. Ranking influence tactics in Performance Evaluation of Public sector. India J Sci Res. 2014; 37:23-38. [Google Scholar]
18. Nikpoor C, Bearkam SY. Enterprise agility: a view from the PRISM lab. Int J Agile Manag Sys. 2011; 1(1):51-9. [DOI:10.1108/14654659910266736]
19. Khosrowabadi A, Mohammadi H. Organizational architecture and its role in increasing productivity. Human Resource Manag. 2016; 3:112-43.
20. Walker M. A day in the life of an enterprise architect. Technical Report, Microsoft Corporation; 2007. [Google Scholar]
21. Miranzadeh S. Investigating the effect of organizational agility on organizational performance in Birjand Education Organization. Tehran: Payame Noor University; 2017.
22. Baldrige.M. performance measurement. Int Dent J. 1989.51(1): 17-22 [DOI:10.1177/002029408902200204]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |