Write your message
Volume 8, Issue 1 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)                   Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(1): 32-41 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahidi R, Golmohammadi R, Pirmoradi Rizevandi Z, Soltani A, Shirmohammadi Khoram N, Kazemi R. Study of Daytime Lighting at Official Rooms and Its Relation with Personnel's Cognitive Performance, Alertness, Visual Comfort and Sleep Quality. Iran J Ergon. 2020; 8 (1) :32-41
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-647-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Hygiene, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Department of Occupational Hygiene, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , golmohamadi@umsha.ac.ir
3- Office of Research, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 472 kb]   (3462 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (4504 Views)

Using natural light or artificial lights with adequate illuminance and high correlated color temperature can increase the alertness and visual comfort to some extent and improve the sleep quality of day staff employers.


Extended Abstract:   (609 Views)
Introduction

Lack of adequate lighting in the workplace can endanger the general health of employees by affecting the circadian rhythm and human visual system and cause a wide range of visual and non-visual problems [1]. Visual effects of lighting include visual comfort and non-visual effects include changes in level of consciousness, cognitive function and sleep quality, fatigue and occupational errors, decreased sleep quality at night, and consequently decreased job satisfaction and productivity and increased absenteeism [6-2]. High light intensity as the most important quantitative variable can not only increase vitality and mental alertness but can also objectively increase a person's performance [8]. Another characteristic of light affecting vision is the color rendering index and color temperature, which depend on the light spectrum [9]. Natural light is the best light source in terms of having full spectrum and sufficient intensity, which regulates physiological functions and improves general health [9].
On the one hand, architectural limitations for the optimal use of natural light and on the other hand, the use of various types of electric lights without color temperature and proper color rendering index is one of the problems of many office environments. However, the quantity and quality of lighting on the work surface varies over time depending on the type and duration of use of lamps, the type of lamps and related equipment, the reflection coefficients of interior surfaces and the presence or absence of natural light. The subject of this study was to study the quantity and quality of various types of artificial light sources in office environments and to compare them with each other, as well as comparing them with natural light and their relationship with mental performance, comfort and alertness of administrative staff in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.


 

Materials and Methods

A descriptive-analytical study was conducted in the winter of 2017 on the educational campus of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. A total of 81 administrative staff located in different rooms of the complex randomly participated in the research from different departments and faculties and moral consent was obtained from all participants. Lighting parameters in rooms with windows were measured in three shifts at the beginning (about 8 o'clock), the middle (around 11 o'clock) and the end of the work shift (around 14 o'clock) and the rooms without windows due to the dynamic state of the combined lighting. Brightness, color temperature and color rendering index were measured horizontally with a Sekonic-7000 spectrometer on the work surface and vertically on the eye surface. To evaluate mental performance, visual comfort, and mental alertness and sleep quality of employees, psychomotor vigilance task test of N-back type at simple level (1-back), Conlon visual comfort questionnaire, questionnaire The KSS Drowsiness Index and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire were used, respectively.


 

Results

The results on the types of lights used in the office rooms showed that some of the lights had a diffuser and some did not, and most of them had fluorescent lamps in the form of tubes, and FPL. Also, the degree of cleanliness and maintenance of the lights was very different. The results of measuring the quantities of light related to the technical and qualitative characteristics of the types of lamps widely used in laboratory conditions are described in Table 1. Also, as an example, the spectrogram of one of the lights is presented in Figure 1.


Figure 1. Spectrogram of linear fluorescent lamp with diffuser and daylight tube lamp
Figure 1. Spectrogram of linear fluorescent lamp with diffuser and daylight tube lamp

 

Comparison of the average color temperature of natural light with different types of fluorescent lamps in laboratory conditions showed that warm white fluorescent lamps have significantly lower color temperature than natural light (P = 0.01). The average intensity of artificial light on the work surface of rooms without windows was 276 Lx and the average intensity of combined light in rooms with windows at three hours 11, 8 and 14 was 724, 615 and 510 lux, respectively, which means that the intensity of combined light is higher than Artificial lighting is in all three hours (P = 0.001). The results showed that the type of lighting had a significant effect on the color temperature on the desktop, so that the average color temperature in the combined lighting was significantly higher than its value in artificial lighting (P = 0.001 and  F = 23.215). The mean of the combined color temperature and the corresponding color manifestation index did not show a statistically significant difference in the three measurement times. However, the color index of artificial light at different hours of measurement was significantly lower than the combined light. This difference was more pronounced at 8 and 11 o'clock than at 2 o'clock (P14 = 0.033, P8,11 = 0.001). According to Fisher's exact test, the distribution of visual comfort in the two types of integrated and artificial lighting indicates more desirable visual comfort in people who are exposed to natural light. Thus, the ratio of people with moderate visual impairment to the total number of employees in the group of employees located in rooms without natural light was 4.7 times higher than the group with natural light (18.2% vs. 3.8%) (P = 0.04 and Chi2 = 4.74). The results of Pearson correlation coefficient test to calculate the relationship between the two variables of color temperature and visual comfort score indicated a negative and significant relationship between these two variables (r = 0.35, P = 0.002). Figure 2 is the diagram showing the correlation between the values ​​of the visual comfort questionnaire and Indicates the color temperature.


Figure 2. Correlation diagram between color temperature in the office environment and visual comfort score


 

Tables 1 and 2 show the results of Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient tests to estimate the relationship between individual variables with color temperature and light intensity at different times of the day, respectively. As can be seen from the data in the tables, only the drowsiness score at 8 and 11 o'clock had a significant relationship with color temperature and the rest were not statistically significant.


Table 1. Results of Pearson correlation analysis between variables of color temperature, drowsiness and performance

Color temperature Variables
r P
-0.228* 0.047 KSS score at 8 o'clock
-0.315* 0.006 KSS score at 11 o'clock
-0.09 0.44 KSS score at 14 o'clock
-0.028 0.82 PVT test response speed at 8 o'clock
-0.08 0.50 PVT test response speed at 11 o'clock
-0.89 0.47 PVT test response speed at 14 o'clock
-0.115 0.33 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 8 o'clock
-0.147 0.22 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 11 o'clock
-0.065 0.6 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 14 o'clock
                                                  P-value>0.05


Table 2. Results of Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis between variables of light intensity, visual comfort and performance

Intensity  of lighting Variables
r P
-0.049 0.68 Visual Comfort Score
-0.168 0.16 Visual comfort class
-0.025 0.86 KSS score at 8 o'clock
0.17 0.23 KSS score at 11 o'clock
0.088 0.54 KSS score at 14 o'clock
-0.004 0.98 PVT test response speed at 8 o'clock
0.126 0.30 PVT test response speed at 11 o'clock
0.181 0.14 PVT test response speed at 14 o'clock
-0.116 0.89 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 8 o'clock
0.141 0.25 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 11 o'clock
-0.004 0.98 Percentage of correct answer of PVT test at 14 o'clock


Table 3. Independent t-test to compare visual comfort status, response speed and correct response percentage

  Type of lighting Number of measurements M SD T P
KSS score Merely artificial 84 3.2 1.3 2.80 0.004
Natural 156 7.2 1.4
PVT test response speed (Hundredth of a second) Merely artificial 69 476 50 0.56 0.580
Natural 140 463 48
Percentage of correct answer of PVT test Merely artificial 74 96.4 2.4 1.07 0.202
Natural 143 95.8 4.6


Table 4 compares the sleep quality class statistics according to PSQI, which shows the relatively better sleep quality of people living in rooms with natural light. But this difference was not statistically significant.


 Table 4. Fisher test to compare the sleep quality of people in two groups of workplace lighting

      Type of lighting Chi2 P
Combined Merely artificial
Sleep quality Good Number of persons 30 14 0.44 0.50
Percentage in lighting type group 57.7 50
Weak   22 14
  42.3 50
Total   52 28
  100 100
 
Discussion

The light produced by different types of lamps has incomplete light spectrum and non-uniform spectrum distribution and lower light intensity compared to natural light. Therefore, as expected, some visual and non-visual effects were observed in employees deprived of natural light in comparison with employees benefiting from this gift, which is in line with the general perception of review studies by Van Bommel and Stephen [1, 18].
The results obtained regarding the difference between color temperature and color index of natural and artificial light inside the building are according to the study of Borisuit et al.; that even in cloudy weather conditions, the values ​​attributed to natural light are higher [20]. According to the results of this study, none of the employees had visual disturbances higher than the average. The result of this study in terms of the increasing effect of color temperature on visual comfort and the general relationship between these two variables was consistent with the study conducted by Shamul et al. and the study of Sivaji et al. [21, 22]. There was a direct and significant relationship between increasing color temperature and decreasing drowsiness at 8 and 11 o'clock, relying on some results of studies by some researchers such as Te Kulve [23]. However, this relationship was very weak for 14:00, which can be attributed to the increase in fatigue caused by intellectual workload during working hours [24]. Also, according to the Souman systematic review study, the effect of color temperature on alertness was not the same in all studies and some studies had conflicting results [25].
Examination of the correlation between light intensity variables with visual comfort and performance showed that there was no significant relationship between them. However, many studies, such as the study of Smolders et al., showed an increase in alertness with increasing light intensity [27]. One of the reasons for this contradiction is the lack of control over other variables affecting visual comfort and performance in this field study. The high proportion of people with moderate visual disturbance in the group of people living in rooms without natural light is consistent with the Borisuit study and indicates the desirability of using natural light in this regard [20, 28]. Although the quality of sleep of people with natural light was better than expected in rooms without natural light, as expected and in line with the results of a study by researchers such as Boubekri, this difference was not statistically significant [29].


 

Conclusion

Using natural light or artificial lights with adequate illuminance and high correlated color temperature can increase the alertness and visual comfort to some extent and improve the sleep quality of day staff employers.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all those who assisted in the writing of this article.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

 

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2019/07/28 | Accepted: 2020/06/9 | ePublished: 2020/06/9

References
1. Westland S, Pan Q, Lee S. A review of the effects of colour and light on non‐image function in humans. Coloration Technology. 2017 Oct;133(5):349-61. [DOI:10.1111/cote.12289]
2. Cajochen C. Alerting effects of light. Sleep medicine reviews. 2007 Dec 1;11(6):453-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.009] [PMID]
3. Smolders KC, De Kort YA, Cluitmans PJ. Higher light intensity induces modulations in brain activity even during regular daytime working hours. Lighting Research & Technology. 2016 Jun;48(4):433-48. [DOI:10.1177/1477153515576399]
4. Lavoie S, Paquet J, Selmaoui B, Rufiange M, Dumont M. Vigilance levels during and after bright light exposure in the first half of the night. Chronobiology international. 2003 Jan 1;20(6):1019-38. [DOI:10.1081/CBI-120025534] [PMID]
5. Huiberts LM, Smolders KC, de Kort YA. Non-image forming effects of illuminance level: exploring parallel effects on physiological arousal and task performance. Physiology & behavior. 2016 Oct 1;164:129-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.035] [PMID]
6. Juslén H, Tenner A. Mechanisms involved in enhancing human performance by changing the lighting in the industrial workplace. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2005 Sep 1;35(9):843-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.03.002]
7. Katsuura T. Physiological Anthropology: Effects of artificial light environment on humans. Physical (Biological) Anthropology. 2009 Jul 29:68. [Article]
8. Kobayashi H, Ishibashi K, Noguchi H. Heart rate variability; an index for monitoring and analyzing human autonomic activities. Applied Human Science. 1999 Mar 30;18(2):53-9. [DOI:10.2114/jpa.18.53] [PMID]
9. Hashmi K. Daylight vs Artificial Light. Swedish Energy Agency. 2008. [Google Scholar]
10. Lehrl S, Gerstmeyer K, Jacob JH, Frieling H, Henkel AW, Meyrer R, Wiltfang J, Kornhuber J, Bleich S. Blue light improves cognitive performance. Journal of neural transmission. 2007 Apr 1;114(4):457-60. [DOI:10.1007/s00702-006-0621-4] [PMID]
11. Chellappa SL, Steiner R, Blattner P, Oelhafen P, Götz T, Cajochen C. Non-visual effects of light on melatonin, alertness and cognitive performance: can blue-enriched light keep us alert?. PloS one. 2011;6(1). [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0016429] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Kretschmer V, Schmidt KH, Griefahn B. Bright light effects on working memory, sustained attention and concentration of elderly night shift workers. Lighting Research & Technology. 2012 Sep;44(3):316-33. [DOI:10.1177/1477153511418769]
13. Kretschmer V, Griefahn B, Schmidt KH. Bright light and night work: effects on selective and divided attention in elderly persons. Lighting Research & Technology. 2011 Dec;43(4):473-86. [DOI:10.1177/1477153511405808]
14. Caruso CC. Negative impacts of shiftwork and long work hours. Rehabilitation Nursing. 2014 Jan;39(1):16-25. [DOI:10.1002/rnj.107] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Ansiau D, Wild P, Niezborala M, Rouch I, Marquie JC. Effects of working conditions and sleep of the previous day on cognitive performance. Applied ergonomics. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):99-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.004] [PMID]
16. Pirmoradi Z, Golmohammadi R, Faradmal J, Motamedzade M. Artificial Lighting and Its Relation with Body Posture in Office Workplaces. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2018 Mar 15;5(4):9-16. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.5.4.9]
17. Virtanen M, Singh-Manoux A, Ferrie JE, Gimeno D, Marmot MG, Elovainio M, Jokela M, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M. Long working hours and cognitive function: the Whitehall II Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2009 Mar 1;169(5):596-605. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwn382] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Van Bommel WJ. Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work. Applied ergonomics. 2006 Jul 1;37(4):461-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.009] [PMID]
19. Rautkylä E, Puolakka M, Tetri E, Halonen L. Effects of correlated colour temperature and timing of light exposure on daytime alertness in lecture environments. Journal of Light & Visual Environment. 2010;34(2):59-68. [DOI:10.2150/jlve.34.59]
20. Borisuit A, Linhart F, Scartezzini JL, Münch M. Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood. Lighting Research & Technology. 2015 Apr;47(2):192-209. [DOI:10.1177/1477153514531518]
21. Shamsul BM, Sia CC, Ng YG, Karmegan K. Effects of light's colour temperatures on visual comfort level, task performances, and alertness among students. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2013;1(7):159-65. [DOI:10.12691/ajphr-1-7-3]
22. Chuan NK, Bahri S. Lighting does matter: Preliminary assessment on office workers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;97:638-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.283]
23. Te Kulve M, Schlangen L, Schellen L, Souman JL, van Marken Lichtenbelt W. Correlated colour temperature of morning light influences alertness and body temperature. Physiol Behavior. 2018 Mar 1;185:1-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.004] [PMID]
24. Dijk DJ, Lockley SW. Invited Review: Integration of human sleep-wake regulation and circadian rhythmicity. J Appl Physiol. 2002 Feb 1;92(2):852-62. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00924.2001] [PMID]
25. Souman JL, Tinga AM, Te Pas SF, Van Ee R, Vlaskamp BN. Acute alerting effects of light: A systematic literature review. Behaviour Brain Res. 2018 Jan 30;337:228-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.016] [PMID]
26. Smolders KC, De Kort YA, Cluitmans PJ. A higher illuminance induces alertness even during office hours: findings on subjective measures, task performance and heart rate measures. Physiol Behavior. 2012 Aug 20;107(1):7-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.028] [PMID]
27. Hua Y, Oswald A, Yang X. Effectiveness of daylighting design and occupant visual satisfaction in a LEED Gold laboratory building. Build Environ. 2011 Jan 1;46(1):54-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.016]
28. Boubekri M, Cheung IN, Reid KJ, Wang CH, Zee PC. Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Jun 15;10(06):603-11. [DOI:10.5664/jcsm.3780] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Harrington JM. Health effects of shift work and extended hours of work. Occupational and Environmental medicine. 2001 Jan 1;58(1):68-72. [DOI:10.1136/oem.58.1.68] [PMCID]
30. Dehghan H, Mohebian Z, Yadegarfar G. Evaluation of Effects of Different Levels of Brightness on Attention and Reaction Time under Laboratory Conditions. Iran J Ergonom. 2017 Mar 15;4(4):48-56. [DOI:10.21859/joe-04047]
31. Correa A, Barba A, Padilla F. Light effects on behavioural performance depend on the individual state of vigilance. PloS one. 2016;11(11). [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0164945] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |