Write your message
Volume 9, Issue 4 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2022)                   Iran J Ergon 2022, 9(4): 199-210 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 102413802055221400162374084

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tabe Afshar S, Toofan S, Saghafi Asl A. Studying the Role of Workplaces Layout on Employees Health: Sick Building Syndrome. Iran J Ergon. 2022; 9 (4) :199-210
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-868-en.html
1- PhD. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. , shr.toofan@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract:   (1187 Views)
Background and Objectives: Workplace architecture is one of the most important factors influencing employees' health and wellbeing. Therefore, it is necessary to study the role of workplace design on the emergence of various types of health problems among employees. The present research aims to study the prevailing conditions at the case studied workplaces and to identify the role of factors influenced by interior layout (location-ergonomics, lighting, indoor air quality (IAQ), temperature, noise, design style, and cleaning) on the emergence of Sick Building Syndrome among employees.

Method: In the present study, three administration buildings [roads and urban development office, construction engineering organization, and airport] in Urmia, Tabriz are investigated as case studies and a total of 226 employees working in these buildings are selected as samples. Then, they are asked to fill out a questionnaire to collect the required data. The reliability of the questionnaire is confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The SPSS V.25 software is used to statistically analyze the data.

Results: The findings indicate that despite the advantages of open plan layout for the organization of work environments, it provides many negative consequences such as increased noise and distraction, lack of ergonomics, congestion, reduced privacy, and the impossibility of personal control of environmental conditions. In general, it is not considered an efficient layout design for the workplace.

Conclusion: The results indicate that to effectively deal with the emergence of sick building syndrome and provide a healthy work environment, it is required to establish a balance between various parts in the workplace layout design including private office space, shared workplace, and/or open-plan according to the nature and type of work while considering the factors and parameters influenced by the layout design and environmental characteristics.
Full-Text [PDF 1143 kb]   (120 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2022/02/3 | Accepted: 2022/03/1 | ePublished: 2022/03/1

References
1. Ghaffarianhoseini A, AlWaer H, Omrany H, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Alalouch C, Clements-Croome D, et al. Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough? Archit Sci Rev 2018; 61(3): 99-121. [DOI]
2. Hoang Quoc C, Vu Huong G, Nguyen Duc H. Working conditions and sick building syndrome among health care workers in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(10): 3635. [DOI]
3. Rostron J. Sick building syndrome: A review of causes, consequences and remedies. J Retail Leis Prop 2008; 7(4): 291-303. [DOI]
4. Mahmoudi M. Sick building symdrome. In: Mahmoudi M, editor. Allergy and asthma. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2016. [DOI]
5. Designing Buildings Wiki. Sick building syndrome. [Online]. [cited 14 Dec 2020]. [Article]
6. Ahmadi M, Golbabaei F, Behzadi M. The effect of sick building syndrome (SBS) on the productivity of administrative staff. Int J Occup Hyg 2014; 6(4): 210-9.
7. Passarelli GR. Sick building syndrome: An overview to raise awareness. JOBE 2009; 5(1): 55-66. [DOI]
8. Bahobail MA. Sick building syndromes and their effects on homes within Riyadh city. J King Saud Univ 2013; 25(2): 69-78.
9. Jansz J. Sick building syndrome. In: Cockerham WC, editor. International encyclopedia of public health. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Elsevier Science; 2017. p. 502-5. [DOI]
10. Abdul-Wahab S. Sick building syndrome in public buildings and workplaces. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
11. Nduka DO, Ogunbayo B, Ajao A, Ogundipe K, Babalola B. Survey datasets on sick building syndrome: Causes and effects on selected public buildings in Lagos, Nigeria. Data Brief 2018; 20: 13406. [DOI]
12. Ch.Stylianos I. Post-occupancy evaluation of office buildings (or schools) – comparing user satisfaction and actual indoor environment conditions, [MSc Thesis].
13. Abdel-Hamid M, Hakim SA, Elokda EE, Mostafa NS. Prevalence and risk factors of sick building syndrome among office workers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2013; 88(2): 109-14 [DOI]
14. Danielsson CB, Bodin L. Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environ Behav 2008; 40(5): 636-68. [DOI]
15. Al-Anzi, NM. Workplace Environment and its impact on Employee Performance. [Thesis]. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Open University of Malaysia; 2009.
16. Oodith D, Brijball S. Impact of sick building syndrome on call centre agents’ effectiveness. JEBS 2012; 4(9): 532-47. [DOI]
17. Andersson K. Epidemiological approach to indoor air problems. Indoor Air 1998; 8(54): 32-9. [DOI]
18. Jansz J. Sick building syndrome identification and risk control measures. In: Abdul-Wahab AA, editor. Sick building syndrome. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 113-33. [DOI]
19. Mukhi N, Khare M. Sick building syndrome. J Ind Pollut Control 2005; 5(2): 46-53.
20. Janis J. Sick Building Syndrome identification and risk control measures. In Abdul-Wahab SA. Editor. Sick building syndrome: in public buildings and workplaces. Springer, UK: p. 533-88. [DOI]
21. Office layout: Types, examples, & tips’. [Online]. 2022; Available from: URL: https://www.edrawmax.com/office-layout/
22. Sick building syndrome: Is your office making you ill?’. [Online]. [cited 11 Jan 2020]; Available from URL: https://paint-inspection.co.uk/sick-building-syndrome-infographic/
23. Aries MBC, Veitch JA, Newsham GR. Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. J. Environ. Psychol 2010; 30(4): 533-41. [DOI]
24. Duval CL, Charles KE, Veitch JA. Open-plan office density and environmental satisfaction. IRC, National Research Council Canada; 2002. [DOI]
25. Office Work Design. ‘5 popular types of office layout you must try!’ [Online]. 2019; Available from: URL: https://www.officeworkdesign.com/office-layout-plan/

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |