Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 4 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomic 2026)                   Iran J Ergon 2026, 13(4): 260-269 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Afshari A. The Impact of Ergonomic Digital Workplace Design and Smart Tools on Musculoskeletal Disorders and Employee Productivity. Iran J Ergon 2026; 13 (4) :260-269
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1109-en.html
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Science, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran , a_afshari@maragheh.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1830 Views)
Objectives: With the expansion of digital technologies and the increasing use of smart tools in workplaces, challenges, such as musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and reduced employee productivity, have emerged. This study aimed to examine the impact of ergonomic digital workplace design and smart tools on MSDs and employee productivity at Maragheh University.
Methods: This study employed a descriptive-analytical design. The statistical population included administrative employees of Maragheh University in 2024. A total of 150 people were selected as a sample from the population above according to the Morgan table and the stratified random sampling method. Data were collected using the Sprecher et al. questionnaire to assess MSDs and an organizational productivity questionnaire. The obtained data were then analyzed using Pearson's correlation and multiple regression in SPSS software (version 25).
Results: The findings revealed a significant negative relationship between musculoskeletal health and productivity (r = -0.47), indicating that increased musculoskeletal problems were associated with decreased efficiency (r = -0.41), task quality (r = -0.39), goal commitment (r = -0.45), and time management (r = -0.36). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that digital workplace design and the use of smart tools were significantly associated with reduced musculoskeletal problems (β = -0.52, P < 0.05) and increased employee productivity (β = 0.46, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results indicate that ergonomic workplace design combined with smart tools reduces musculoskeletal discomfort and enhances employee productivity. These findings emphasize the importance of ergonomic workplaces and smart tools in promoting both employee health and performance.
Full-Text [PDF 920 kb]   (56 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Ergonomics in Design
Received: 2025/09/11 | Accepted: 2025/12/24 | ePublished: 2025/12/24

References
1. Zadem A, Chettouh S, Saadi S. The role of ergonomics and workplace design in enhancing employee well-being. J Prev Ergon. 2024;18(2):43.
2. Rupera P. Mobile workstation to put end to street cobblers' misery. Times of India. 2025.
3. Hasiwar D, Gruber A, Dragschitz C, Ivkic I. Towards a cloud-based smart office solution for shared workplace individualization. SciTePress. 2024;1:367-74. [DOI:10.5220/0012739000003711]
4. Bagga E, Yang A. Real-time posture monitoring and risk assessment for manual lifting tasks using MediaPipe and LSTM. ACM. 2024. [DOI:10.1145/3688868.3689199]
5. Shuaibu H, Saleh MA. Impact of workplace design on employee well-being and productivity. Front Manag Soc Sci. 2025;1(1):55-63. [DOI:10.63725/fmss.v1i1.05]
6. Daneshmandi H. The effect of musculoskeletal problems on fatigue and productivity among office personnel. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017;59(1):1-7. [DOI:10.4103/2008-7802.195851] [PMID]
7. Mahmud N, Kenny DT, Md Zein R, Hassan SN. Ergonomic Training Reduces Musculoskeletal Disorders among Office Workers: Results from the 6-Month Follow-Up. Malays J Med Sci. 2011;18(2):16-26.
8. Mugisha KE. Innovations in ergonomic design: Enhancing workplace safety. Res Output J Eng Sci Res. 2025;4(2):44-51. [DOI:10.59298/ROJESR/2025/4.2.4451]
9. Puspita RA. The influence of digital technology on human resource management practice. Manag Stud Bus J. 2024;1(1):108-15. [DOI:10.62207/4d99e676]
10. Chinedu OO, Henry AT, Nene JJ, Okwudili JD. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among office workers in higher education institutions: A cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(5). [DOI:10.4314/ejhs.v30i5.10] [PMID]
11. Moghaddamnia MT, Shahrestanaki YA, Maroufizadeh S, Ghanbari Nikoo R, Pourvakhshoori N. Musculoskeletal disorders of emergency medical services personnel and their associations with job content: A cross-sectional study. J Health Emerg Disasters Q. 2025;10(3):153-66. [DOI:10.32598/hdq.10.3.55.2]
12. Milaković M, Koren H, Bradvica-Kelava K, Bubaš M, Nakić J, Jeličić P, Bucić L, Bekavac B, Čvrljak J, Capak M. Telework-related risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1155745. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1155745] [PMID]
13. Demissie B, Bayih ET, Demmelash AA. A systematic review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and risk factors among computer users. Heliyon. 2024;10(3).e25075. [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25075] [PMID]
14. Krishnan KS, Raju G, Shawkataly O. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Psychological and physical risk factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):9361. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179361] [PMID]
15. Maiti A, Ye A, Schmidt M, Pedersen S. A privacy-preserving desk sensor for monitoring healthy movement breaks in smart office environments with the internet of things. Sensors. 2023;23(4):2229. [DOI:10.3390/s23042229] [PMID]
16. Indra B, Palmutra V, Setyawan FA. Effectiveness of digital interventions in reducing occupational stress: a systematic review. Port J Public Health. 2024;42(3):252-65. [DOI:10.1159/000540748] [PMID]
17. Flor-Unda O, Larrea-Araujo C, Arcos-Reina R, Bohórquez N, Andino W, Rosero H, et al. Technologies for reducing musculoskeletal disorders in nursing workers: A scoping review. Technologies. 2025;13(9):378. [DOI:10.3390/technologies13090378]
18. Ou YK, Liu Y, Chang YP, Lee BO. Relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and work performance of nursing staff: A comparison of hospital nursing departments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):7085. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18137085] [PMID]
19. Robertson MM, Amick BC 3rd, DeRango KA, Rooney TP, Bazzani L, Harrist R, et al. Effect of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior, and musculoskeletal risk. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(1):124-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.12.009] [PMID]
20. Voordt Tvander, Jensen PA. The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs. J Corp Real Estate. 2023;25(1):29-49. [DOI:10.1108/JCRE-03-2021-0012]
21. Weiner Santos W, Rojas C, Isidoro R, Lorente A, Dias A, Mariscal G, Benlloch M, Lorente R. Efficacy of ergonomic interventions on work-related musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2025;14(9):3034. [DOI:10.3390/jcm14093034] [PMID]
22. Sprenger JA, Hill JC, Dunn KM. Development and initial validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ). BMJ Open. 2016;6(8), e012331. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012331] [PMID]
23. Hoffman BJ, Jones C. Employee productivity scale: Development and validation. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1996;6(3):173-95.
24. Hoffman M, Tadelis S. People management skills, employee attrition, and manager rewards: an empirical analysis. 2018. [DOI:10.3386/w24360]
25. Faraghati F, Asadollahzadeh M J, Hasani M. Ergonomic risk assessment and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among urban train operators in Mashhad, Iran: A study based on the rapid entire Body assessment (REBA) method. Iran J Ergon. 2025;13(1):38-47.
26. Mohammadjani Kumeleh S, Rashidi M A, Akbari A. Evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders, mental workload, general health, and occupational stress among office employees. Iran J Ergon. 2025;12(4):313-323. [DOI:10.32592/IJE.12.4.313]
27. Maleki Roveshti M, Raei M, Valipour F. The Impact of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Occupational Risk Factors on the Physical Status of Iranian Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review. Iran J Ergon. 2023;11(2):137-147. [DOI:10.32592/IJE.11.2.137]
28. Omidi M R, Omidi N, Meftahi H, Panahi M. Determining the effect of ergonomic principles of the work environment on the burnout of employees of Ilam petrochemical company with the role of safety culture moderator. Iran J Ergon. 2023;10(4):259-266. [DOI:10.32592/IJE.10.4.259]
29. Karwowski W. Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems. Ergonomics. 2005;48(5):436-63. [DOI:10.1080/00140130400029167] [PMID]
30. Nurmi N, Hinds PJ. Work design for global professionals: Connectivity demands, connectivity behaviors, and their effects on psychological and behavioral outcomes. Organ Stud. 2020;41(4):1697-724. [DOI:10.1177/0170840620937885]
31. Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM. Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J of Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):272-95. [DOI:10.1007/s10926-006-9044-1] [PMID]
32. Bongers PM, Kremer AM, Laak JT. Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41(5):315-42. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.10050] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |