Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2025)
Iran J Ergon 2025, 13(3): 198-205 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: 1397.481
Ethics code: IR.UMSU.REC.1397.481
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Daryushi S, Allahyari T, Karimi Z, Khalkhali H. The Effect of Pillow Type and Sleeping Posture on Cervical Angle and Perceived Comfort. Iran J Ergon 2025; 13 (3) :198-205
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1100-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1100-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran ,allahyarit@yahoo.com
3- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran ,
3- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract: (3666 Views)
Objectives: Pillows play a crucial role in supporting muscles and maintaining the natural posture of the neck during sleep. The present study aimed to measure and investigate the effect of pillow shape, filling material, and sleeping posture on cervical angle and perceived comfort during sleep.
Methods: Ten participants (five males and five females) with a mean age of 26.7 years participated in this study. Each participant used four pillows (two cylindrical and two rectangular, one with wool content and the other with memory foam) for one hour (30 minutes in the supine position and 30 minutes in the lateral position). During the experiment, the cervical angle was measured using a Kinect sensor. At the end of each 30-minute session, the participants were asked to report their perceived comfort level using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Analysis of variance revealed that the cervical angle in the cylindrical wool pillow with the supine posture was significantly greater than in other conditions (P < 0.01). The smallest cervical angle was observed with the rectangular memory foam pillow in the lateral posture. Comparison of the effects of sleeping posture on cervical angle showed a significant difference between the two postures (P < 0.01). The highest perceived comfort was reported in the lateral posture using a cylindrical pillow.
Conclusion: The results indicate that pillow shape, material, and sleeping posture significantly affect cervical angle and perceived comfort. In this study, a rectangular memory foam pillow was superior in terms of angle, and a cylindrical pillow was superior in terms of comfort. Therefore, selecting an appropriate pillow based on sleeping posture may help improve comfort and maintain proper cervical posture during sleep.
Methods: Ten participants (five males and five females) with a mean age of 26.7 years participated in this study. Each participant used four pillows (two cylindrical and two rectangular, one with wool content and the other with memory foam) for one hour (30 minutes in the supine position and 30 minutes in the lateral position). During the experiment, the cervical angle was measured using a Kinect sensor. At the end of each 30-minute session, the participants were asked to report their perceived comfort level using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Analysis of variance revealed that the cervical angle in the cylindrical wool pillow with the supine posture was significantly greater than in other conditions (P < 0.01). The smallest cervical angle was observed with the rectangular memory foam pillow in the lateral posture. Comparison of the effects of sleeping posture on cervical angle showed a significant difference between the two postures (P < 0.01). The highest perceived comfort was reported in the lateral posture using a cylindrical pillow.
Conclusion: The results indicate that pillow shape, material, and sleeping posture significantly affect cervical angle and perceived comfort. In this study, a rectangular memory foam pillow was superior in terms of angle, and a cylindrical pillow was superior in terms of comfort. Therefore, selecting an appropriate pillow based on sleeping posture may help improve comfort and maintain proper cervical posture during sleep.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Ergonomics in Design
Received: 2025/08/10 | Accepted: 2025/10/19 | ePublished: 2025/12/21
Received: 2025/08/10 | Accepted: 2025/10/19 | ePublished: 2025/12/21
References
1. Cai D, Chen HL. Ergonomic approach for pillow concept design. Appl Ergon. 2016;52: 142-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.004] [PMID]
2. Sacco ICN, Pereira ILR, Dinato RC, Silva VC, Friso B, Viterbo SF. The effect of pillow height on muscle activity of the neck and mid-upper back and patient perception of comfort. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(6):375-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.012] [PMID]
3. James D, Myers J, Murphy J, Rooney M, Taylor J, Torii L. Effect of mattresses and pillow designs on promoting sleep quality, spinal alignment and pain reduction in adults, Systematic reviews of controlled trials. New York: Utica College; 2015. [Link]
4. Jeon MY, Jeong H, Lee S, Choi W. Park JH, Tak SJ. Improving the quality of sleep with an optimal pillow: a randomized, comparative study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;233(3):183-8. [DOI: 10.1620/tjem.233.183] [PMID]
5. Gordon SJ, Grimmer-Somers KA, Trott PH. Pillow use: the behavior of cervical stiffness, headache and scapular/arm pain. J Pain Res. 2010;3:137-45. [DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s10880] [PMID]
6. Kim JY, Park JS, Park DE. Biomechanical evaluation of the neck and shoulder when using pillows with various inner materials. J Ergon Soc Korea. 2011;30(2):339-47. [DOI: 10.5143/JESK.2011.30.2.339]
7. Allahyari T, Sahraneshin Samani A, Khalkhali HR. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for measurement of neck angle: comparison with electrogoniometry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017;23(4):524-532. [DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1219148] [PMID]
8. Microsoft. Kinect for Windows human interface guidelines. ed 2013. [Link]
9. Summers S. Evidence-based practice part 2: Reliability and validity of selected acute pain instruments. J Perianesth Nurs. 2001;16(1):35-40. [DOI: 10.1053/jpan.2001.20657] [PMID]
10. Daryushi S, Allahyari T, Karimi Z. The Influence of pillow shape and content on neck muscular activity and perceived comfort. Open Public Health J. 2025;18: e18749445371712. [DOI: 10.2174/0118749445371712250130065843]
11. Mi Yang J, Jeong H, Lee S, Choi W, Park JH, Taket SJ, et al. Improving the quality of sleep with an optimal pillow: a randomized, comparative study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;233(3):183-188. [DOI: 10.1620/tjem.233.183] [PMID]
12. Jacobson BH, Wallace T, Gemmell H. Subjective rating of perceived back pain, stiffness, and sleep quality following introduction of medium-firm bedding systems. J Chiropr Med. 2006;5(4):128-34. [DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60145-1] [PMID]
13. Gordon SJ, Grimmer-Somers K, Trott P. Pillow use: the behaviour of cervical pain, sleep quality and pillow comfort in side sleepers. Man ther. 2009;14(6):671-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.02.006] [PMID]
14. Hagino C, Boscariol J, Dover L, Letendre R, Wicks M. Before/after study to determine the effectiveness of the align-right cylindrical cervical pillow in reducing chronic neck pain severity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21(2):89-93. [PMID].
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
