Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2025)
Iran J Ergon 2025, 13(3): 215-222 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.976
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Asghari Eskoui S, Azghani M R, Jalali S. The Impact of Occupational Categories on Foot Pain and Functional Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Foot Function Index (FFI). Iran J Ergon 2025; 13 (3) :215-222
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1094-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1094-en.html
1- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
2- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran ,azghani@sut.ac.ir
2- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran ,
Abstract: (3359 Views)
Objectives: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), particularly foot problems, are among the leading causes of reduced quality of life and work productivity. Evidence suggests that occupational conditions and daily activities play a crucial role in the development of foot pain. This study aimed to examine the relationship between occupational status, severity of foot pain, and functional impairment in various occupational groups using the Foot Function Index (FFI).
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 2,848 participants from East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Based on occupational status, participants were categorized as employees, self-employed, housewives (only women), and students. Data were collected using the FFI questionnaire. The data's normality was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Since the distribution was non-normal, inter-group comparisons were performed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise comparisons with the Mann–Whitney U test and the Bonferroni correction, as necessary.
Results: The results revealed that students, both men and women, reported the highest levels of foot functional problems, while employees and self-employed individuals had lower FFI scores. Among women, housewives reported fewer problems than students. Statistical analyses confirmed significant differences among the occupational groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that occupational status is directly associated with foot pain and functional impairment. The results highlight that students, as a high-risk group, require special attention in preventive programs and orthopedic and ergonomic interventions. Identifying the impact of occupational factors on foot health can provide a basis for designing strategies to improve occupational health and reduce the burden of MSDs.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 2,848 participants from East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Based on occupational status, participants were categorized as employees, self-employed, housewives (only women), and students. Data were collected using the FFI questionnaire. The data's normality was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Since the distribution was non-normal, inter-group comparisons were performed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by pairwise comparisons with the Mann–Whitney U test and the Bonferroni correction, as necessary.
Results: The results revealed that students, both men and women, reported the highest levels of foot functional problems, while employees and self-employed individuals had lower FFI scores. Among women, housewives reported fewer problems than students. Statistical analyses confirmed significant differences among the occupational groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that occupational status is directly associated with foot pain and functional impairment. The results highlight that students, as a high-risk group, require special attention in preventive programs and orthopedic and ergonomic interventions. Identifying the impact of occupational factors on foot health can provide a basis for designing strategies to improve occupational health and reduce the burden of MSDs.
Keywords: Activity limitation, Disability, Foot function index (FFI), Foot pain, Occupational categories
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Musculoskeletal Disorders
Received: 2025/07/22 | Accepted: 2025/10/12 | ePublished: 2025/12/21
Received: 2025/07/22 | Accepted: 2025/10/12 | ePublished: 2025/12/21
References
1. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-570. [DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4] [PMID]
2. Cole DC, Ibrahim SA, Shannon HS, Eyles J. Work correlates of back problems and activity restriction due to musculoskeletal disorders in the Canadian national population health survey (NPHS) 1994–5 data. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(11):728-734. [DOI: 10.1136/oem.58.11.728] [PMID]
3. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88(9):419-428. [DOI: 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419] [PMID]
4. Kuyvenhoven MM, Gorter KJ, Zuithoff P, Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Post MW. The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): A clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(5):1023-1028. [PMID]
5. Razavi S, Bashteni A, Zarghani S, Tabaraee Y. A survey on prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and associated risk factors among Sabzevarian farmers in 2011. JSUMS. 2014;20(5):766-772. [Link]
6. Daneshvar S, Sadeghi M, Barsam T, Moghadam Rahimi S, Feyzi V. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and its contributing factors in farmers of Zarand in 2010-2011. J Occup Hyg Eng. 2015;2(2):23-32. [Link]
7. Choobineh A, Nouri E, Arjmandzadeh A, Mohamadbaigi A. Musculoskeletal disorders among bank computer operators. IOH. 2006;3(2):12-17. [Link]
8. Rahimabadi S, Khanjani N, Mardi H. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and their related factors in workers of a dairy factory, Nishabur, Iran. JHAD. 2012;1(2):121-129. [Link]
9. Choobineh A, Rajaeefard A, Neghab M. Association between perceived demands and musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a questionnaire survey. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2006;12(4):409-16. [DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076699] [PMID]
10. Arghami S, Kamali K, NasabAlhosseini M. A survey on musculoskeletal pain in suburban bus drivers. J Occup Hyg Eng. 2015;2(2):72-81. [Link]
11. Tayyari F, Smith J. Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications. New York: Springer; 1997. [Link]
12. Canca-Sánchez FJ, Morales-Asencio JM, Ortega-Ávila AB, et al. Predictive factors for foot pain in the adult population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):52. [DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07144-9] [PMID]
13. Noor I, Ayaz P, Anjum O. Work-related foot pain and its associated risk factors among health care professionals: a cross-sectional study. JHWCR. 2025;3(8):e512–e512. [Link]
14. Park JH, Lim HS, Lee K. Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among dairy farmers in Gyeonggi Province, Korea. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010;43(3):205-212. [DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.3.205] [PMID]
15. Choobineh A, Rahimi Fard H, Jahangiri M, Mahmood Khani S. Musculoskeletal injuries and their associated risk factors in office workplaces. IOH. 2012;8(4):70-81. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
