Write your message
Volume 7, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2019)                   Iran J Ergon 2019, 7(3): 24-32 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rajabi Shameli E, Sheikhhoseini R, Asadi Melerdi S. The Relationship Between the School Furniture Dimensions and Trunk Alignment with Musculoskeletal Disorders in Boy Students in Karaj. Iran J Ergon 2019; 7 (3) :24-32
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-666-en.html
1- MsC, Department of Corrective Exercise & Sport Injury, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Corrective Exercise & Sport Injury, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran , rahman.pt82@gmail.com
3- MSc, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 1200 kb]   (9340 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (6995 Views)

It seems that school furniture dimensions in sixth grade boy students of elementary school in Karaj were not in acceptable condition. So, we suggest that ergonomics standardization of school furniture should be considered to prevent its possible consequences.


Extended Abstract:   (1952 Views)
Introduction

Students with musculoskeletal disorders have a high incidence of many factors that can be considered. According to studies, the science of ergonomics and its relation to musculoskeletal disorders is undeniable. These studies reported a clear association between self-reported discomfort and musculoskeletal injury and their association with environmental factors [3, 21]. On the other hand, with the change of the educational system in Iran, the students of the sixth grade have recently moved from the guidance to the elementary level and it is possible that the ergonomics of the elementary schools may not be in line with the needs and anthropometric dimensions of these individuals and this may result in the emergence of co-existing musculoskeletal disorders which has not been investigated to date to the best of our knowledge. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the ergonomics of desk and chair and trunk posture with musculoskeletal disorders in elementary school boys in Karaj.

 

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 346 elementary sixth grade male students of Karaj, Iran, were selected. Height and weight of subjects were measured using digital scales and gauges. A flexible ruler with high internal validity and reliability was used to evaluate kyphosis and lordosis [22, 23]. In order to measure with flexible ruler the location of C7, T2, T12, S2 vertebrae was determined by touch and observation. After marking the vertebrae, a flexible ruler was placed on the spinal cord to take the shape of the spine, then the specified points on the body were marked on a flexible ruler, the ruler was transferred to paper; the curves were drawn on the paper in the same way and the points marked on the curves were also marked. The distance between two points was measured as the length of curvature [L] and the maximum value of curvature depth as [H]. Then, putting the numbers obtained in the formula θ=4Arctang2H.L, the kyphosis and lordosis were measured. Anthropometric measurements and ergonomic dimensions of class equipment were measured using a 50 cm metal ruler. Elbow flexion height was measured at 90 degrees elbow flexion position for height of elbow. In this case, the forearm and seat should be in a parallel status. The popliteal height of the vertical distance from the lower leg to the posterior surface of the knee or popliteal space was measured so that the thigh and calf were positioned at straight and right angles at 90 degrees knee flexion. To measure shoulder height, the vertical distance of the shoulder from the Acromion to the seat surface was considered. Pupil-popliteal length was measured from the posterior surface of the hip to posterior surface of the knee in popliteal space with the knee in 90 degrees flexion. Table height vertical to ground to front edge, bench height vertical to ground highest point and bench depth horizontal distance from seat back to seat at front seat to front bench was measured [25,26]. A 9-item Nordic Questionnaire with acceptable reliability and validity was used to assess musculoskeletal disorders [27]. Spearman correlation test at the significant level of 0.05 was used to analyze the data.


 

Results

Demographic characteristics of the students are presented in Table 1.
 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of students, 346 male students of elementary sixth grade of Karaj [n = 346]

Variable M± SD Minimum Maximum
Age 11.51± 0.5 11 12
Weight 44.7±12.38 24 82
Height 148.93±8.18 122 173
BMI 19.92±4.28 12.33 31.56
Kyphosis 34.84±8.23 13.84 57.43
Lourdes 39.33±10.16 17.37 77.15


The results showed that only 18% of the students had desk height appropriate to the anthropometric characteristics and 80% of the students had desk height greater than the maximum. Bench depth is proportional to 12% of students, while for 82%, it is smaller than the permissible limit and 4% were using benches with depth greater than the maximum permissible. Bench height is in the normal range for 50% of students, 17.1% of students are using benches with height less than the minimum standard and 32% of the desks have heightwith greater than the maximum for students. The results also showed that there was no significant relationship between lordosis and thoracic kyphosis with table and bench dimensions [Table 2].

Table 2. Relationship between table dimensions and class bench with kyphosis anomalies

Static variable Dimensions of table and bench Correlation The correlation coefficient
Breast kyphosis Bench height 0.841 0.011
Depth bench 0.262 -0.061
Table height 0.489 -0.037
Lumbar lordosis Bench height 0.157 -0.076
Depth bench 0.861 -0.009
Table height 0.155 -0.077


Table 3 provides information about pain in body areas, the frequency and percentage of pain among students.
 

Table 3. Information about pain areas

Pain area title Frequency Frequency [%]
Neck 49 14
Shoulder 31 8
Forearm 12 3
Hands and wrists 30 8
Back 53 15
Waist 42 12
Thighs 13 3
Knees 15 4
Foot and Ankle 44 12


Table 4 presents the number of areas with musculoskeletal pain, frequency and percentage of pain among students in nine areas of the body.
 

Table 4. Information on the number of pain areas in the student body

Number of areas involved Frequency Frequency [%]
0 178 51
1 97 28
2 33 9
3 30 8
4 5 1
5 2 0
6 1 0


It can be seen in Table 5 that there is only a significant negative relationship between the bench depth component and the Nordic score. The smaller the bench depth, the greater the number of areas with pain in the students.
 

Table 5. Information on Musculoskeletal Pain and Ergonomic Dimensions of Table and Bench

Components P-value The correlation coefficient
Chair height with Nordic score 0.532 0.034
Depth bench with Nordic score 0.038 -0.112
Table height and Nordic score 0.692 0.021


 

Conclusion

It seems that the ergonomic situation of the Karaj elementary school desks and benches at the sixth grade is not acceptable and therefore it is suggested that standardization be put on the agenda to prevent its possible consequences. On the other hand, it seems that prolonged exposure to inaccurate situations, which may be due to inappropriate ergonomics on the school benches, may have multiple consequences for the students long-term.


 

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the sincere cooperation of the Alborz Education Department. The personal costs of the researchers have been used to implement the project.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.


 

Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2019/10/16 | Accepted: 2020/01/2 | ePublished: 2020/01/12

References
1. Perruccio AV, Yip C, Power JD, Canizares M, Badley EM. Discordance between population impact of musculoskeletal disorders and scientific representation: a bibliometric study. Arthritis Care & Research. 2019; 71(1):56-60. [DOI:10.1002/acr.23583] [PMID]
2. Rothrauff BB, Pirosa A, Lin H, Sohn J, Langhans MT, Tuan RS. Stem cell therapy for musculoskeletal diseases. In ? editors. Principles of Regenerative Medicine. Berlin: Elsevier; 2019. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809880-6.00054-0]
3. Azabagic S, Spahic R, Pranjic N, Mulic M. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders in primary school children in bosnia and herzegovina. Materia Socio-Medica. 2016; 28(3):164-7. [DOI:10.5455/msm.2016.28.164-167] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Grimes P, Legg S. Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) in school students as a risk factor for adult MSD: a review of the multiple factors affecting posture, comfort and health in classroom environments. Journal of the Human-Environment System. 2004; 7(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1618/jhes.7.1]
5. Delele M, Janakiraman B, Bekele Abebe A, Tafese A, van de Water ATM. Musculoskeletal pain and associated factors among Ethiopian elementary school children. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018; 19(1):276. [DOI:10.1186/s12891-018-2192-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Becker AJ, Heathcote LC, Timmers I, Simons LE. Precipitating events in child and adolescent chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Reports. 2018; 3(1):e665. [DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000665] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Clinch J. Chronic Musculoskeletal pain in adolescence and young adulthood. In: McDonagh JE, Tattersall RS, editors. Adolescent and Young Adult Rheumatology in Clinical Practice. Cham. Berlin: Springer; 2019. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-95519-3_12]
8. Joergensen AC, Hestbaek L, Andersen PK, Nybo Andersen AM. Epidemiology of spinal pain in children: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2019; 178(5):695-706. [DOI:10.1007/s00431-019-03326-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Cowie J. Visualising and treating pain in children. The Journal of Pain. 2019; 20(4):S72. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.089]
10. Hänninen O, Koskelo R. Adjustable tables and chairs correct posture and lower muscle tension and pain in high school students. Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association; Day ?, Month ?, Country ?; 2003.
11. da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2010; 53(3):285-323. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.20750] [PMID]
12. Meshgin S, Sheikhhoseini R, Balouchi R. The relationship between upper body posture with physical activity, psychological properties and electronic entertainment using measures in female primary students in Tehran. Journal of Ergonomics. 2018; 6(2):7-15. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.6.2.7]
13. Desouzart G, Filgueiras E, Matos R, Dagge R, editors. Postural Education: correlation between postural habits and musculoskeletal pain in school age children; In ? editors ?. Book ?. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2016. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_23]
14. Lee Y, Kim YM, Lee JH, Yun MH. Anthropometric mismatch between furniture height and anthropometric measurement: A case study of Korean primary schools. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2018; 68:260-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.08.010]
15. Oyewole SA, Haight JM, Freivalds A. The ergonomic design of classroom furniture/computer work station for first graders in the elementary school. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2010; 40(4):437-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.02.002]
16. Al-Hinai N, Al-Kindi M, Shamsuzzoha A. An Ergonomic Student Chair Design and Engineering for Classroom Environment. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research. 2018; 7(5):534-43. [DOI:10.18178/ijmerr.7.5.534-543]
17. Boudrifa H, Slimani S, Oubrahem O, Ghachi M. The Effect of Prolonged Sitting on Students. In ? editors. Occupational and Environmental Safety and Health. Berlin: Springer; 2019. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-14730-3_27]
18. Gunzburg R, Balagué F, Nordin M, Szpalski M, Duyck D, Bull D, et al. Low back pain in a population of school children. European Spine Journal. 1999; 8(6):439-43. [DOI:10.1007/s005860050202] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Panagiotopoulou G, Christoulas K, Papanckolaou A, Mandroukas K. Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Applied Ergonomics. 2004; 35(2):121-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.002] [PMID]
20. Hafezi R, Mirmohammadi S, Mehrparvar A, Akbari H, Akbari H. An analysis of anthropometric data on Iranian primary school children. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2010; 39(4):78. [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Habibi E, Asaadi Z, Hosseini SM. Proportion of elementary school pupils' anthropometric characteristics with dimensions of classroom furniture in Isfahan, Iran. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 16(1):98. [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Khakhali-Zavieh M, Parnian-Pour M, Karimi H, Mobini B, Kazem-Nezhad A. The Validity and reliability of measurement of thoracic kyphosis using flexible ruler in postural hyper kyphotic patients. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2003; 4(3):18-23. [Article] [Google Scholar]
23. Seidi F, Rajabi R, Ebrahimi T, Tavanai A, Moussavi S. The Iranian flexible ruler reliability and validity in lumbar lordosis measurements. World Journal of Sport Sciences. 2009; 2(2):95-9. [Article] [Google Scholar]
24. Seidi F, Rajabi R, Ebrahimi I, Alizadeh MH, Minoonejad H. The efficiency of corrective exercise interventions on thoracic hyper-kyphosis angle. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2014; 27(1):7-16. [DOI:10.3233/BMR-130411] [PMID]
25. Parcells C, Stommel M, Hubbard RP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: Empirical findings and health implications. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1999; 24(4):265-73. [DOI:10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00113-X]
26. Gouvali MK, Boudolos K. Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics. 2006; 37(6):765-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009] [PMID]
27. Namnik N, Negahban H, Salehi R, Shafizadeh R, Tabib MS. Validity and reliability of Persian version of the Specific Nordic questionnaire in Iranian industrial workers. Work. 2016; 54(1):35-41. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-162268] [PMID]
28. Parvez M, Parvin F, Shahriar M, Kibria G. Design of ergonomically fit classroom furniture for primary schools of Bangladesh. Journal of Engineering. 2018; Article ID: 3543610 [DOI:10.1155/2018/3543610]
29. Dianat I, Karimi MA, Hashemi AA, Bahrampour S. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Applied Ergonomics. 2013; 44(1):101-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.004] [PMID]
30. Altaboli A, Belkhear M, Bosenina A, Elfsei N. Anthropometric evaluation of the design of the classroom desk for the fourth and fifth grades of benghazi primary schools. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015; 3:5655-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.778]
31. Jayaratne K. Making a difference: ergonomics for children in developing countries. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 2012. [Google Scholar]
32. Yousefi B. The relationship between some characteristics of ergonomic desks and chairs of schools with anthropometric indices of male students of Kermanshah city and abnormalities of the spine and musculoskeletal upper limb. Harakat. 2006; 26:23-40. [Google Scholar]
33. Drzaƚ-Grabiec J, Snela S, Rykaƚa J, Podgórska J, Rachwal M. Effects of the sitting position on the body posture of children aged 11 to 13 years. Work. 2015; 51(4):855-62. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-141901] [PMID]
34. Yoosefy B. A study of the relationship among come ergonomic features of school desks & benches and anthropometry indices of male students from kermanshah plus prevalence of spinal column and upper skeletal organ abnormalities. 2006. [Google Scholar]
35. Azuan M, Zailina H, Shamsul B, Asyiqin N, Azhar M, Aizat IS. Neck, upper back and lower back pain and associated risk factors among primary school children. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2010; 10(5):431-5. [DOI:10.3923/jas.2010.431.435]
36. Perquin CW, Hazebroek-Kampschreur AAJM, Hunfeld JAM, Bohnen AM, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Passchier J, et al. Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience. Pain. 2000; 87(1):51-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00269-4]
37. Murphy S, Buckle P, Stubbs D. Classroom posture and self-reported back and neck pain in schoolchildren. Applied Ergonomics. 2004; 35(2):113-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.001] [PMID]
38. Syazwan A, Azhar MM, Anita A, Azizan H, Shaharuddin M, Hanafiah JM, et al. Poor sitting posture and a heavy schoolbag as contributors to musculoskeletal pain in children: an ergonomic school education intervention program. Journal of Pain Research. 2011; 4:287-96. [DOI:10.2147/JPR.S22281] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |