Volume 7, Issue 2 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2019)                   Iran J Ergon 2019, 7(2): 11-18 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arabian A, Makkiabadi B, Masjoodi S, Azam K, Ghafari E, Torabi Nassaj E et al . Ergonomic Assessment of the Sit-Stand Seat on Urban Bus Transport. Iran J Ergon. 2019; 7 (2) :11-18
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-639-en.html
Professor, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , zakerian@sina.tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2633 Views)

Background and Objectives: In recent years, due to the rapid growth of metropolitan cities and the shortage of urban public transport means, including urban bus transportation, many people are forced to travel in a standing position when using these vehicles. This situation may cause pain and discomfort and non-collision injuries for passengers. The purpose of this study was ergonomic assessment of the sit-standing seat in passengers standing on urban buses.
Methods: To do this study, 8 young people with a mean age of 25.25±2.12 years were enrolled. For evaluation and assessing the effect of sit-standing seat two methods of surface Electromyography (sEMG) and Borg scale scores were applied in Fall 2018. The data was analyzed using SPSS 24.
Results: In all body parts, except for the hip, the mean scoring of Borg’s scale for perceived discomfort in sit-standing position was less than standing position. Also, the amount of contractile activity of the leg muscles in sit-standing position was significantly lower than the standing position (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Considering the results obtained from the Borg scale scores and the contraction activity of the leg muscles as a result of the use of the mentioned seat, which led to a reduction in the level of discomfort and the leg muscles contraction, it is recommended to apply the sit-stand seat instead of being in a standing position.

Full-Text [PDF 458 kb]   (1277 Downloads) |   |   Extended Abstract (HTML)  (620 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/06/30 | Accepted: 2019/08/27 | ePublished: 2019/11/11

1. Sustainable WBCf, Development. Mobility 2001 Report. 2001. [Report online; available from: http://docs.wbcsd.org/2001/12/Mobility2001_FullReport.pdf
2. Hataminejad H, Purahmad A, Faraji Sabokbar H, Azimi A. Satisfaction analysis of public transportation users in the south alborz. Journal of Urban Economics and Management. 2015 Mar 15;3(9):105-23.
3. Pucher J, Korattyswaroopam N, Ittyerah N. the crisis of public transport in india: overwhelming needs but limited resources. Journal of public transportation. 2004;7(4):1. [DOI:10.5038/2375-0901.7.4.1]
4. Aidoo EN, Agyemang W, Monkah JE, Afukaar FK. passenger's satisfaction with public bus transport services in Ghana: A case study of Kumasi-Accra route. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management. 2013 May 1;8(2):33-44.
5. Omranzadeh B, Garakhlou M, Purahmad A. Analyses and efficiency evaluation of BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) system and its public satisfaction in tehran metropolis. Human Geography Research. 2010; 42(3), 19-38.
6. Pereira C, da Silva RA, de Oliveira MR, Souza RD, Borges RJ, Vieira ER. Effect of body mass index and fat mass on balance force platform measurements during a one-legged stance in older adults. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2018 May 1;30(5):441-7. [DOI:10.1007/s40520-017-0796-6] [PMID]
7. Palacio A, Tamburro G, O'Neill D, Simms CK. Non-collision injuries in urban buses-Strategies for prevention. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2009 Jan 1;41(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.016] [PMID]
8. Halpern P, Siebzehner MI, Aladgem D, Sorkine P, Bechar R. Non-collision injuries in public buses: a national survey of a neglected problem. Emergency medicine journal. 2005 Feb 1;22(2):108-10. [DOI:10.1136/emj.2003.013128] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Schubert P, Liebherr M, Kersten S, Haas CT. Biomechanical demand analysis of older passengers in a standing position during bus transport. Journal of Transport & Health. 2017 Mar 1;4:226-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2016.12.002]
10. Sarraf TA, Marigold DS, Robinovitch SN. Maintaining standing balance by handrail grasping. Gait & posture. 2014 Jan 1;39(1):258-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.117] [PMID]
11. Chester MR, Rys MJ, Konz SA. Leg swelling, comfort and fatigue when sitting, standing, and sit/standing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2002 May 1;29(5):289-96. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00069-5]
12. Iran, Transportation and Traffic Organization of Tehran Municipality (2017). Excerpts of statistics and information of tehran transportation and traffic. Retrieved from Transportation and Traffic Organization of Tehran Municipality:
13. Arabian, A., & Zakerian, A. (2018). miniature chair specialized for places with space limitation. In: Iran, Patent and Trademark Office, I.P.O, A47C 3/00, Iran. http://ipm.ssaa.ir/Search-Result?page=1&DecNo=139750140003003893&RN=97732
14. Iwamoto Y, Takahashi M, Shinkoda K. Differences of muscle co-contraction of the ankle joint between young and elderly adults during dynamic postural control at different speeds. Journal of physiological anthropology. 2017 Dec;36(1):32. [DOI:10.1186/s40101-017-0149-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Uchida Y, Demura S. Differences in leg muscle activity and body sway between elderly adults able and unable to maintain one-leg stance for 1 min: the effect of hand support. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2016 Aug 1;28(4):669-77. [DOI:10.1007/s40520-015-0461-x] [PMID]
16. Wang Y, Watanabe K, Asaka T. Aging effect on muscle synergies in stepping forth during a forward perturbation. European journal of applied physiology. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):201-11. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-016-3514-8] [PMID]
17. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of electromyography and Kinesiology. 2000 Oct 1;10(5):361-74. [DOI:10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4]
18. Konrad P. The abc of emg. A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography. 2005 Apr;1(2005):30-5.
19. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Jan 1;16(Suppl 1):55-8. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.1815] [PMID]
20. Ulin SS, Ways CM, Armstrong TJ, Snook SH. Perceived exertion and discomfort versus work height with a pistol-shaped screwdriver. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1990 Nov 1;51(11):588-94. https://doi.org/10.1202/0002-8894(1990)051<0588:PEADVW>2.0.CO;2 [DOI:10.1202/0002-8894(1990)0512.0.CO;2]
21. Daneshmandi H, Choobineh AR, Rajaee-Fard A-R. Validation of Borg's RPE 6-20 Scale in Male Industrial Workers of Shiraz City Based on Heart Rate. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2012;11(1):1-10.
22. Shen W, Parsons KC. Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort. International journal of industrial ergonomics. 1997 Dec 1;20(6):441-61. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00068-6]
23. Antle DM, Vézina N, Côté JN. Comparing standing posture and use of a sit-stand stool: analysis of vascular, muscular and discomfort outcomes during simulated industrial work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2015 Feb 1;45:98-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.12.009]
24. Sartika SJ, Dawal SZ. A comparison of the effect of using sit/stand stool on prolonged standing task. Age (years). 2010;24(1.51):25-5.
25. Le P, Marras WS. Evaluating the low back biomechanics of three different office workstations: Seated, standing, and perching. Applied ergonomics. 2016 Sep 1;56:170-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.001] [PMID]
26. Nicoletti C, Läubli T. Leg and back muscle activity, heart rate, performance and comfort during sitting, standing, and using a sit-stand-support with different seat angles. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2018 Sep 1;67:73-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.04.011]
27. De Bruyne MA, Van Renterghem B, Baird A, Palmans T, Danneels L, Dolphens M. Influence of different stool types on muscle activity and lumbar posture among dentists during a simulated dental screening task. Applied ergonomics. 2016 Sep 1;56:220-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.014] [PMID]
28. Hall JE. Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology e-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015 May 31.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Co-Publisher: Farname Inc.