Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Volume 6, Issue 2 (Journal of Ergonomics 2018)
Iran J Ergon 2018, 6(2): 1-6 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aghilian S N, Rahami M, Shambayati H. The effect of ideology on forensic ergonomics of legislative policy: A review of forensic ergonomics. Iran J Ergon 2018; 6 (2) :1-6
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-541-en.html
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-541-en.html
The effect of ideology on forensic ergonomics of legislative policy: A review of forensic ergonomics
1- PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , naderaghilian@mihanmail.ir
2- Associate Professor, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (9941 Views)
Introduction: Establishing order depends on different arrangements in many aspects of lif. The fulfillment of order should be along with good policy and developed strategic principles, at the micro level and with the correct, firm and prudence legislation in the institutions and governance. Forensic ergonomics is one of the fields that helps this aim. Today it has become more widely used due to the creation of legal problems in the field of accidents and injuries. Therefore, this study reviews articles about forensic ergonomics and the effect of ideology on it.
Materials & Methods: This is a review study. The English articles published in Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar were chosen using keywords such as “forensic ergonomics” and “forensic human factor” without time limit; at least 3 articles were eligible.
Results: In the review section, the results showed that there is an agreement in the definition of forensic ergonomics, but there are very few studies. The results also showed that the use of forensic ergonomics is increasing, and the prospect of this area is positive. In the analytical section, the results also indicated that the review and suggestions for the creation of laws in the field of accidents should be assigned to the judicial system, not the executive or legislative system.
Conclusion: In order to progress in the field of legal ergonomics and to prevent the impact of ideology and politics on legislation, there is a need for further introduction and training of experts in this field and paying attention to the rational and scientific principles.
Materials & Methods: This is a review study. The English articles published in Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar were chosen using keywords such as “forensic ergonomics” and “forensic human factor” without time limit; at least 3 articles were eligible.
Results: In the review section, the results showed that there is an agreement in the definition of forensic ergonomics, but there are very few studies. The results also showed that the use of forensic ergonomics is increasing, and the prospect of this area is positive. In the analytical section, the results also indicated that the review and suggestions for the creation of laws in the field of accidents should be assigned to the judicial system, not the executive or legislative system.
Conclusion: In order to progress in the field of legal ergonomics and to prevent the impact of ideology and politics on legislation, there is a need for further introduction and training of experts in this field and paying attention to the rational and scientific principles.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Other Cases
Received: 2018/08/18 | Accepted: 2018/08/27 | ePublished: 2018/08/27
Received: 2018/08/18 | Accepted: 2018/08/27 | ePublished: 2018/08/27
References
1. Wilson JR. Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Applied ergonomics. 2000;31(6):557-67. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00034-X]
2. COHEN HH. Views PERSPECTIVES. Ergonomics IN Design. 2011;3:6.
3. Budnick P. Forensic ergonomics 2011. Available from: https://ergoweb.com/forensic-ergonomics/
4. Ciobanu O. Forensic ergonomics in Romania. International Journal of Criminal Investigation. 2011;1(3):109-13.
5. Sloan GD. Human factors and premises liability. WSTLA Legal Educational Seminars; Seattle1994.
6. Dekker S. The field guide to human error investigations. Routledge; 2017. [DOI:10.4324/9781315202778]
7. Fernandez JE, Ware BF, Marley RJ, Kumar AR. The role of physical ergonomics in litigation. Ergon Des. 2011;19(1):4-8. [DOI:10.1177/1064804611400985]
8. Nemire K. Cognitive Human Factors in Litigation. Ergon Des. 2011;19(1):16-20. [DOI:10.1177/1064804611400988]
9. Cohen J. The Role of Forensic Organizational Ergonomics. Ergon Des. 2011;19(1):29-32. [DOI:10.1177/1064804611401547]
10. Noon RK. Forensic engineering investigation. CRC Press; 2000. [DOI:10.1201/9781420041415]
11. Ciobanu O. Forensic Ergonomics. Case Examples/Ergonomia Criminalistică. Exemple De Cazuri; 2016.
12. Cohen HH. Forensic Ergonomics: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. Ergon Des. 2011;19(1):36-8. [DOI:10.1177/1064804611400986]
13. Anderson J. Roxarsone-tainted Chicken Litter: A Red Flag for Forensic Ergonomists 2006. Available from: https://ergoweb.com/roxarsone-tainted-chicken-litter-a-red-flag-for-forensic-ergonomists/
14. Cohen HH. Basic Concepts in Professional Ergonomics: defined or Debunked? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2000;44(25):119. [DOI:10.1177/154193120004402505]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
