Write your message
Volume 10, Issue 2 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2022)                   Iran J Ergon 2022, 10(2): 140-150 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 66308
Ethics code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1400.125

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vahedi A, Dianat I. Industrial Exoskeletons, Challenges and Suggestions in Ergonomic Studies. Iran J Ergon 2022; 10 (2) :140-150
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-904-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , a.vahedi62@gmail.com
2- Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (3130 Views)
Objectives: The challenges that have been raised today, such as changes in population structure, diverse workforce, mass production, and automation of production, indicate the need to review production systems. Classical ergonomic solutions are no longer suitable for carrying heavy loads and repetitive activities. By supporting workers to reduce physical and mental stress, human-centered assistant applications (HCAAs) should solve this problem. The technical problems of the exoskeleton have been investigated in many scientific studies, but its effect on the human user has not been paid much attention to. So, this study reviews the studies that have examined industrial exoskeletons from the ergonomic point of view
Methods: Papers concerning exoskeleton in ergonomic studies are reviewed using Scopus and PubMed databases. The selected papers were published in the reviewed journals from 2014 to 2021. Books, conference papers, and reports are not included in this study. In the present study, only official scientific journals in English are reviewed, and the references obtained from the search are screened by the title and abstract. The full text of the papers is checked if the abstract does not contain enough information. Those papers that met the inclusion criteria are listed in this review.
Results: Studies on ergonomic industrial exoskeletons account for a small share of studies on industrial exoskeletons. From 2012 to the time of conducting this study, 96 studies were found on industrial exoskeletons, of which 10.41% design or evaluate industrial exoskeletons from an ergonomic point of view. This is very small compared to the studies on exoskeleton conducted since 2012 and only about 0.4% of the studies.
Conclusion: The reviewed studies emphasize the facilitation of the successful use of exoskeletons in occupational structures by considering at least three dimensions (physical requirements, task performance, and usability), all of which can contribute to determining the potential efficiency of exoskeletons in the work environment. Due to the potential of this technology, more studies should be conducted in the future to cover some of the identified challenges and compare the exoskeleton design methods under more diverse and more realistic situations.
Full-Text [PDF 889 kb]   (2719 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2022/08/14 | Accepted: 2022/09/23 | ePublished: 2022/09/23

References
1. Kazerooni H. Berkeley robotics & human engineering laboratory. [Online]. [cited 2012]; Avilable from: URL: https://bleex.me.berkeley.edu [Article]
2. Alabdulkarim S, Kim S, Nussbaum MA. Effects of exoskeleton design and precision requirements on physical demands and quality in a simulated overhead drilling task. Appl Ergon. 2019;80:136-45. [DOI] [PubMed]
3. De Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics. 2016;59(5):671-81. [DOI] [PubMed]
4. de la Tejera JA, Bustamante-Bello R, Ramirez-Mendoza RA, Izquierdo-Reyes J. Systematic review of exoskeletons towards a general categorization model proposal. Appl Sci 2021;11(1):76. [DOI]
5. Schmidtler J, Knott VC, Hölzel C, Bengler K. Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future. Occupational Ergonomics. 2015;12(3):83-95. [DOI]
6. Viteckova S, Kutilek P, Jirina M. Wearable lower limb robotics: A review. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2013;33(2):96-105. [DOI]
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses, requiring days away from work bg, Washington, DC. [Online]. Avilable from: URL: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh2_11102016.pdf [Article]
8. Bosch T, van Eck J, Knitel K, de Looze M. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl Ergon. 2016;54:212-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
9. Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Mokhlespour Esfahani MI, Alemi MM, Alabdulkarim S, Rashedi E. Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I- “Expected” effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:315-22. [DOI] [PubMed]
10. Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Esfahani MIM, Alemi MM, Jia B, Rashedi E. Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II-“Unexpected” effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:323-30. [DOI] [PubMed]
11. Yan Z, Han B, Du Z, Huang T, Bai O, Peng A. Development and testing of a wearable passive lower-limb support exoskeleton to support industrial workers. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2021;41(1):221-38. [DOI]
12. Madinei S, Alemi MM, Kim S, Srinivasan D, Nussbaum MA. Biomechanical assessment of two back-support exoskeletons in symmetric and asymmetric repetitive lifting with moderate postural demands. Appl Ergon. 2020;88:103156. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Iranzo S, Piedrabuena A, Iordanov D, Martinez-Iranzo U, Belda-Lois JM. Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant. Appl Ergon. 2020;87:103120. [DOI] [PubMed]
14. Cha JS, Monfared S, Stefanidis D, Nussbaum MA, Yu D. Supporting surgical teams: Identifying needs and barriers for exoskeleton implementation in the operating room. Hum Factors. 2020;62(3):377-90. [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Hyun DJ, Bae K, Kim K, Nam S, Lee DH. A light-weight passive upper arm assistive exoskeleton based on multi-linkage spring-energy dissipation mechanism for overhead tasks. Rob Auton Syst. 2019;122:103309. [DOI]
16. Luger T, Seibt R, Cobb TJ, Rieger MA, Steinhilber B. Influence of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton during simulated industrial work tasks on physical load, upper body posture, postural control and discomfort. Appl Ergon. 2019;80:152-60. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Sylla N, Bonnet V, Colledani F, Fraisse P. Ergonomic contribution of ABLE exoskeleton in automotive industry. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(4):475-81. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |