1. Kazerooni H. Berkeley robotics & human engineering laboratory. [Online]. [cited 2012]; Avilable from: URL: https://bleex.me.berkeley.edu [
Article]
2. Alabdulkarim S, Kim S, Nussbaum MA. Effects of exoskeleton design and precision requirements on physical demands and quality in a simulated overhead drilling task. Appl Ergon. 2019;80:136-45. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
3. De Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics. 2016;59(5):671-81. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
4. de la Tejera JA, Bustamante-Bello R, Ramirez-Mendoza RA, Izquierdo-Reyes J. Systematic review of exoskeletons towards a general categorization model proposal. Appl Sci 2021;11(1):76. [
DOI]
5. Schmidtler J, Knott VC, Hölzel C, Bengler K. Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future. Occupational Ergonomics. 2015;12(3):83-95. [
DOI]
6. Viteckova S, Kutilek P, Jirina M. Wearable lower limb robotics: A review. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2013;33(2):96-105. [
DOI]
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses, requiring days away from work bg, Washington, DC. [Online]. Avilable from: URL: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh2_11102016.pdf [
Article]
8. Bosch T, van Eck J, Knitel K, de Looze M. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl Ergon. 2016;54:212-7. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
9. Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Mokhlespour Esfahani MI, Alemi MM, Alabdulkarim S, Rashedi E. Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I- “Expected” effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:315-22. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
10. Kim S, Nussbaum MA, Esfahani MIM, Alemi MM, Jia B, Rashedi E. Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II-“Unexpected” effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:323-30. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
11. Yan Z, Han B, Du Z, Huang T, Bai O, Peng A. Development and testing of a wearable passive lower-limb support exoskeleton to support industrial workers. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2021;41(1):221-38. [
DOI]
12. Madinei S, Alemi MM, Kim S, Srinivasan D, Nussbaum MA. Biomechanical assessment of two back-support exoskeletons in symmetric and asymmetric repetitive lifting with moderate postural demands. Appl Ergon. 2020;88:103156. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
13. Iranzo S, Piedrabuena A, Iordanov D, Martinez-Iranzo U, Belda-Lois JM. Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant. Appl Ergon. 2020;87:103120. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
14. Cha JS, Monfared S, Stefanidis D, Nussbaum MA, Yu D. Supporting surgical teams: Identifying needs and barriers for exoskeleton implementation in the operating room. Hum Factors. 2020;62(3):377-90. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
15. Hyun DJ, Bae K, Kim K, Nam S, Lee DH. A light-weight passive upper arm assistive exoskeleton based on multi-linkage spring-energy dissipation mechanism for overhead tasks. Rob Auton Syst. 2019;122:103309. [
DOI]
16. Luger T, Seibt R, Cobb TJ, Rieger MA, Steinhilber B. Influence of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton during simulated industrial work tasks on physical load, upper body posture, postural control and discomfort. Appl Ergon. 2019;80:152-60. [
DOI] [
PubMed]
17. Sylla N, Bonnet V, Colledani F, Fraisse P. Ergonomic contribution of ABLE exoskeleton in automotive industry. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(4):475-81. [
DOI]