Volume 8, Issue 2 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)                   Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(2): 39-49 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbassinia M, Kalatpour O, Motamedzadeh M, Soltanian A, Mohammadfam I. The Application of Lean Production in Reducing Human Error and Improving Response in Emergencies: A case Study in a Petrochemical Industry. Iran J Ergon. 2020; 8 (2) :39-49
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-705-en.html
1- Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Ergonomics Department, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics, Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , mohammadfam@umsha.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2060 Views)
Background and Aim: Petrochemical industry is one of the most accident-prone industries, and most accidents in this industry are related to human factors. The principles of Lean production are one of the approaches used to improve the production situation. Various studies have shown that implementing Lean production improves the safety and ergonomics. In this study, the principles of Lean production were used to reduce human error and improve response in emergencies.
Methods:  The basic CREAM method was used to evaluate human errors. In order to select Lean production tools appropriate to the emergency response tasks, the opinions of the 20-member panel of specialists and experts, including industry managers, HSE officials, and university professors, were used. For examining the impact of Lean production principles on reducing human error in emergencies, 6 months after the implementation of Lean production interventions, human error was re-examined. Evaluation of human errors after Lean production interventions was also performed by basic CREAM method.
Results: The results of the evaluation of human errors before and after the implementation of Lean production interventions showed that the level of control mode of the three sub-tasks improved from the tactical control mode to the strategic control mode. The most probable human error was in evacuate sub-task.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the implementation of those interventions that in addition to improving the level of safety, can improve organizational productivity, is more accepted by industry management.
Full-Text [PDF 390 kb]   (872 Downloads) |   |   Extended Abstract (HTML)  (269 Views)  
The results of this study showed that the implementation of those interventions that in addition to improving the level of safety, can improve organizational productivity, is more accepted by industry management.
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/04/14 | Accepted: 2020/07/21 | ePublished: 2020/07/21

1. Aliabadi MM, Esmaeili R, Mohammadfam I, Ashrafi M. Application of a Standardized Plant Analysis Risk-human Reliability Method to Pipeline Inspection Gauge Operations. J Occup Hygiene Engin Vol. 2019; 6(3):34-43. [Google Scholar]
2. Mohammadfam I, Bastani S, Esaghi M, Golmohamadi R, Saee A. Evaluation of coordination of emergency response team through the social network analysis. Case study: oil and gas refinery. Safety Health Work. 2015; 6(1):30-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2014.09.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Shirali GA, Hosseinzadeh T, Kalhori SRN. Modifying a method for human reliability assessment based on CREAM-BN: A case study in control room of a petrochemical plant. MethodsX. 2019; 6:300-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2019.02.008] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Abbassinia M, Kalatpour O, Soltanian AR, Mohammadfam I, Ganjipour M. Determination and score of effective criteria to prioritize emergency situations in a petrochemical industry. Occup Hygiene Health Prom J. 2019; 3(1):16-25. [DOI:10.18502/ohhp.v3i1.961]
5. Karagiannis GM, Piatyszek E, Flaus JM. Industrial emergency planning modeling: A first step toward a robustness analysis tool. J Hazard Material. 2010; 181(1-3):324-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.014] [PMID]
6. Zameni F, Soltanzadeh A, Nasiri P. Designing a conceptual model for the relationship between shift work, job stress, job satisfaction and health: A case study in petrochemical industry. Iran J Ergonomic. 2018; 6(2):64-70. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.6.2.64]
7. Abbassinia M, Kalatpour O, Motamedzade M, Soltanian A, Mohammadfam I. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing emergency in a petrochemical industry. Arch Trauma Res. 2020; 9(1):35-40. [DOI:10.4103/atr.atr_85_19]
8. Petrillo A, De Felice F, Falcone D, Silvestri A, Zomparelli F. A hybrid probabilistic model for evaluating and simulating human error in industrial emergency conditions (HEIE). J Fail Anal Prevent. 2017; 17(3):462-76. [DOI:10.1007/s11668-017-0262-y]
9. Azadeh M, Keramati A, Mohammadfam I, Bernal-Agustín J, Contreras J, Martín-Flores R. Enhancing the availability and reliability of power plants through macroergonomics approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2000; 11(4):635-53. [Article] [Google Scholar]
10. Azadeh A, Nouri J, Mohammadfam I. The impacts of total system design factors on human performance in power plants. America J Appl Sci. 2005; 2(9):1301-4. [DOI:10.3844/ajassp.2005.1301.1304]
11. Shah S, Ganji EN, Coutroubis A, editors. Lean production practices to enhance organisational performance. MATEC Web of Conferences; 2017: EDP Sciences. [DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201712502003]
12. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production--Toyota's secret weapon in the global car wars that is now revolutionizing world industry. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2007. [Book]
13. Deshmukh G, Patil CR, Deshmukh MG, editors. Manufacturing industry performance based on lean production principles. Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE). Paper presented at the first International Conference on IEEE; Navi Mumbai ,India; 2017. [DOI:10.1109/ICNTE.2017.7947977]
14. Holman D, Wall TD, Clegg CW, Sparrow P, Howard A. The essentials of the new workplace: a guide to the human impact of modern working practices. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. [Book]
15. Botti L, Mora C, Regattieri A. Integrating ergonomics and lean manufacturing principles in a hybrid assembly line. Comp Indust Eng. 2017; 111:481-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.011]
16. Demirkesen S. Measuring impact of Lean implementation on construction safety performance: a structural equation model. Product Plan Control. 2020; 31(5):412-33. [DOI:10.1080/09537287.2019.1675914]
17. Zarrin M, Azadeh A. Simulation optimization of lean production strategy by considering resilience engineering in a production system with maintenance policies. Simul. 2017; 93(1):49-68. [DOI:10.1177/0037549716666682]
18. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM): Elsevier; 1998. [Book]
19. Saurin TA, Formoso CT, Cambraia FB. Towards a common language between Lean production and safety management. Paper presented at the14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction; Santiago, Chile; 2006. [Article]
20. Abbasinia M, Kalatpour O, Motamedzadeh M, Soltanian A, Mohammadfam I. Dynamic human error assessment in emergency using fuzzy bayesian cream. J Res Health Sci. 2020; 20(1):1-6. [DOI:10.34172/jrhs.2020.03] [PMID]
21. Jackson PR, Mullarkey S. Lean production teams and health in garment manufacture. J Occup Health Psych. 2000; 5(2):231-45. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.231 [DOI:10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.231] [PMID]
22. Zakerian SA, Monazam M, Habibi MM, Soltani GR, Asghari M. Relationship between knowledge of ergonomics and work-place conditions with musculoskeletal disorders among nurses of two Iranian hospitals. Occup Med. 2012; 4(6):19-25. [Google Scholar]
23. Hendrick HW. Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success. Appl Erg. 2003; 34(5):419-27. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00062-0]
24. Hasle P. Lean production-an evaluation of the possibilities for an employee supportive lean practice. Human Factor Erg Manufact Service Indust. 2014; 24(1):40-53. [DOI:10.1002/hfm.20350]
25. Bäckstrand G, Bergman C, Högberg D, Moestam L. Lean and its impact on workplace design. Paper presented at the 45th Nordic Ergonomics & Human Factors Society Conference; 11-14 August; Reykjavík, Iceland; 2013.
26. Longoni A, Pagell M, Johnston D, Veltri A. When does lean hurt?-an exploration of lean practices and worker health and safety outcomes. Int J Prod Res. 2013; 51(11):3300-20. [DOI:10.1080/00207543.2013.765072]
27. Womack SK, Armstrong TJ, Liker JK. Lean job design and musculoskeletal disorder risk: A two plant comparison. Human Factor Erg Manufact Service Indust. 2009; 19(4):279-93. [DOI:10.1002/hfm.20159]
28. Dahlgaard JJ, Mi Dahlgaard-Park S. Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture. TQM Mag. 2006; 18(3):263-81. [DOI:10.1108/09544780610659998]
29. Yang CC, Yeh TM, Yang KJ. The implementation of technical practices and human factors of the toyota production system in different industries. Human Fact Erg Manufact Service Ind. 2012; 22(6):541-55. [DOI:10.1002/hfm.20296]
30. Niepce W, Molleman E. Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design? Human Rel. 1998; 51(3):259-87. [DOI:10.1177/001872679805100304]
31. Dankbaar B. Lean production: denial, confirmation or extension of sociotechnical systems design? Human Rel. 1997; 50(5):567-83. [DOI:10.1177/001872679705000505]
32. Landsbergis PA, Cahill J, Schnall P. The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. J Occup Health Psych. 1999; 4(2):108. [DOI:10.1037/1076-8998.4.2.108]
33. Stewart P, Garrahan P. Employee responses to new management techniques in the auto industry. Work Empl Soc. 1995; 9(3):517-36. [DOI:10.1177/095001709593005]
34. Reijula J, Nevala N, Lahtinen M, Ruohomäki V, Reijula K. Lean design improves both health-care facilities and processes: a literature review. Intel Build Int. 2014; 6(3):170-85. [DOI:10.1080/17508975.2014.901904]
35. Asghari M, Omidiyani Doust A, Farvaresh E. Evaluation of the musculoskeletal disorders in the workers of a food manufacturing plant in Tehran. Occup Med J. 2012; 3(4):49-54. [Google Scholar]
36. Koukoulaki T. The impact of lean production on musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks: An examination of sociotechnical trends over 20 years. Appl Erg. 2014; 45(2):198-212. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.018] [PMID]
37. Babson S. Lean or mean: the MIT model and lean production at Mazda. Lab Stud J. 1993; 18:3. [Article]
38. Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI. Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A case study of NUMMI's 1993 model introduction. ILR Rev. 1997; 50(3):416-37. [DOI:10.1177/001979399705000303]
39. Adler PS. Hybridization: human resource management at two Toyota transplants. In Liker J, Fruin KM, Adler P, editors. Remade in America: Transplanting and transforming Japanese management systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
40. Zare A, Yazdani Rad S, Dehghani F, Omidi F, Mohammadfam I. Assessment and analysis of studies related human error in Iran: A systematic review. Health Safety Work. 2017; 7(3):267-78. [Google Scholar]
41. Aykazyan A. Successful implementation of lean through the effective use of employee training, empowerment, and workplace ergonomics. Dominguez Hills: California State University; 2015. [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Co-Publisher: Farname Inc.