Write your message
Volume 6, Issue 1 (Journal of Ergonomics 2018)                   Iran J Ergon 2018, 6(1): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taghizade M, Mohebbi I, Khalkhali H, Ahmadi-Arablu P, Torfeh A, Hajaghazadeh M. The study of anthropometric dimensions of hand in office staffs in Urmia. Iran J Ergon 2018; 6 (1) :1-10
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-439-en.html
1- MSc Student, Department of Occupational health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Occupational health, health faculty, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Associate professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medicine faculty, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
4- BSc Student, Department of Occupational health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
5- , hajaghazadeh@gmail.com
Abstract:   (10100 Views)
Background: The lack of fit between tools and human hand could result in musculoskeletal disorders and decrease efficiency. Designing hand tools, anthropometric data of target population is necessary. A few studies have reported the hand anthropometric dimensions of Iranians. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to measure the most important anthropometric dimensions of hand in a population of office staffs in Urmia.
Methods:In this study, 20 dimensions of dominant hand were measured in 345 participants (217 males and 128 females) using a digital caliper and a plastic tape. The important percentiles were reported by gender. Independent t-test was used to compare the mean of male and female hand dimensions. The length and width of hand were compared with the corresponding data from published literature.
Results: The values of 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles were calculated and tabulated by gender. The hand dimensions of men were larger than those of women. The mean of hand dimensions of men was statistically different from those of women (P=0.001). In contrast to women, the hand length and breadth of the men of this study were significantly different from those of the most of the other communities.
Conclusion: The results of this study could be used by designers or importers of hand tools and gloves. Considering the significant differences of hand dimensions between men and women, it is recommended to use hand dimensions of each gender for designing their related products.
Keywords: Anthropometry, Hand, Female, Male
Full-Text [PDF 396 kb]   (5228 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2017/09/17 | Accepted: 2018/06/30 | ePublished: 2018/06/30

1. Mandahawi N, Imrhan S, Al-Shobaki S, Sarder B. Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38(11):966-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.010]
2. Adeleye AA, Akanbi OG. Hand cumulative trauma disorders in Nigerian custom tailors: the need for redesign of manual scissors. Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1410-23. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2015.1012123]
3. Chandra A, Chandna P, Deswal S. Analysis of hand anthropometric dimensions of male industrial workers of Haryana state. Int J Eng. 2011;5(3):242-56.
4. García-Cáceres RG, Felknor S, Córdoba JE, Caballero JP, Barrero LH. Hand anthropometry of the Colombian floriculture workers of the Bogota plateau. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(2):183-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.12.002]
5. Meunier P, Yin S. Performance of a 2D image-based anthropometric measurement and clothing sizing system. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(5):445-51. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00023-5]
6. Yu A, Yick K, Ng S, Yip J. 2D and 3D anatomical analyses of hand dimensions for custom-made gloves. Appl Ergon. 2013;44(3):381-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.001]
7. Lewis WG, Narayan C. Design and sizing of ergonomic handles for hand tools. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(5):351-6. [DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90074-J]
8. Habibi E, Soury S, Zadeh AH. Precise evaluation of anthropometric 2D software processing of hand in comparison with direct method. J Med Signals Sens. 2013;3(4):256-61. [DOI:10.4103/2228-7477.128338]
9. Nag A, Nag P, Desai H. Hand anthropometry of Indian women. Indian J Med Res. 2003;117:260-9.
10. Sadeghi F, Mazloumi A, Kazemi Z. Anthropometric survey among Iranian Fars workers in factories in the provinces of Tehran, Isfahan and Fars. Occupational Medicine. 2013;5(1):34-45.
11. Shetty S, Parakandy SG, Nagaraja S. Influence of various anthropometric parameters on handgrip strength and endurance in young males and females. Int J Biol Med Res. 2012;3(3):2153-7.
12. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Mostaghaci M, Davari MH, Bahaloo M, Mashtizadeh S. Anthropometric hand dimensions in a population of Iranian male workers in 2012. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):125-30. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2015.1112108]
13. Soury Sh HE, Hasan Zadeh A. Measuring factors affecting grip strength base on ASHT (American society of hand therapists). J Health Syst Res. 2014;10(4):719-28.
14. ISO 15535:2012. General requirements for establishing anthropometric databases; 2012.
15. Standard M. MS ISO 15535: 2008 General requirements for establishing anthropometric databases (ISO 15535: 2006, IDT). Department of Standards Malaysia. 2008. PMCID:PMC2656802
16. Standardization IOf. ISO 15535. Technical Committee ISO/TC 159, Ergonomics, Subcommittee SC 3, Anthropometry and biomechanics; 2012.
17. Garrett JW. The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Hum Factors. 1971;13(2):117-31. [DOI:10.1177/001872087101300204]
18. Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Martínez Buelvas L, Hernández J, Escobar J. Hand anthropometric study in northern Colombia. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017;23(4):472-80. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2016.1217653]
19. Jee S-c, Yun MH. An anthropometric survey of Korean hand and hand shape types. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;53:10-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.10.004]
20. Obi OF. Hand anthropometry survey of rural farm workers in south-eastern Nigeria. Ergonomics. 2016;59(4):603-11. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2015.1073796]
21. Imrhan SN, Sarder M, Mandahawi N. Hand anthropometry in Bangladeshis living in America and comparisons with other populations. Ergonomics. 2009;52(8):987-98. [DOI:10.1080/00140130902792478]
22. Imrhan SN, Nguyen M-T, Nguyen N-N. Hand anthropometry of Americans of Vietnamese origin. Int J Ind Ergon. 1993;12(4):281-7. [DOI:10.1016/0169-8141(93)90098-X]
23. Cederlund RI, Dahlin LB, Thomsen NO. Activity limitations before and after surgical carpal tunnel release among patients with and without diabetes. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(3):261-7. [DOI:10.2340/16501977-0934]
24. Hossain MG, Zyroul R, Pereira B, Kamarul T. Multiple regression analysis of factors influencing dominant hand grip strength in an adult Malaysian population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012;37(1):65-70. [DOI:10.1177/1753193411414639]
25. Boz C, Ozmenoglu M, Altunayoglu V, Velioglu S, Alioglu Z. Individual risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome: an evaluation of body mass index, wrist index and hand anthropometric measurements. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;106(4):294-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.01.002]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |