Write your message
Volume 13, Issue 1 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2025)                   Iran J Ergon 2025, 13(1): 1-9 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: 6103


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezaie Pourmashizi F, Hajilou B, Heidarimoghadam R, Anbarian S, Anbarian M. Comparison of the Pattern of Muscle Synergy during Load Lifting with Two Techniques among Women with Non-specific Back Pain in the Healthy Group. Iran J Ergon 2025; 13 (1) :1-9
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-1047-en.html
1- Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2- Research Institute of Exceptional Children, Research Institute for Education, The Organization for Educational Research and Planning, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health, Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
5- Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran , anbarian@basu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1578 Views)
Objectives: The core muscles of individuals with low back pain show a different activity pattern than the healthy group during load lifting. This issue may be due to changes in spinal control mechanisms, such as muscle synergies. The present study aimed to compare the synergy pattern of selected core muscles and lower limb muscles during load lifting and lowering with two different techniques among females with non-specific back pain in comparison with the healthy group.
Methods: A total of 18 healthy females with non-specific back pain and 18 match controls participated in this study. The activity of 8 muscles of the core and lower limbs was recorded while lifting a load of 10% of the subject's mass with stoop and squat techniques. Then, the pattern of muscle synergies was extracted using the non-negative matrix factorization algorithm. Pearson's correlation method and independent t-test were used to compare synergy patterns (P<0.05).
Results: Patients with back pain had a different muscle synergy pattern than those in the healthy group in stoop and squat techniques. The peak muscle synergy patterns of patients in both techniques were different from those of healthy subjects and were created in a different time cycle of lifting the load.
Conclusion: This study indicated that individuals with non-specific back pain use different synergy patterns during load lifting, and the body's control system may respond differently in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy individuals. The changes observed in the relative weight of muscles in patients and healthy people may be caused by the changes in muscle synergy patterns, which require further studies.
Full-Text [PDF 887 kb]   (539 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Biomechanics
Received: 2024/10/19 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | ePublished: 2025/05/31

References
1. Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, Testa L, Gold PA, Orhurhu V, et al. Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23:1-10. [DOI:10.1007/s11916-019-0757-1] [PMID]
2. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9] [PMID]
3. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2133-2161. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8] [PMID]
4. GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol . 2023;5(6):e316-e329.
5. Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49 :73. [DOI:10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874] [PMID]
6. Rezaei B, Mousavi E, Heshmati B, Asadi Sh. Low back pain and its related risk factors in health care providers at hospitals: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 70:102903. [DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102903] [PMID]
7. Ershad N, Kahrizi S, Parnianpour M, Azghani MR, Khalaf K. Trunk muscle activity during holding two types of dynamic loads in subjects with nonspecific low back pain. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2022; 31:7-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.002] [PMID]
8. Hofste A, Soer R, Groen GJ, van der Palen J, Geerdink FJB, Oosterveld FGJ, et al. Functional and morphological lumbar multifidus characteristics in subgroups with low back pain in primary care. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021; 55: 102429. [DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102429] [PMID]
9. Ahmad S, Muzammil M. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2023; ;29(1):358-65. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2022.2049123] [PMID]
10. Goncharenko LP, Harvey VL, Greer KR, Zhang S, Coster AJ. Longitudinally dependent low‐latitude ionospheric disturbances linked to the Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming of September 2019. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2020;125(8):e2020JA028199. [DOI:10.1029/2020JA028199]
11. Sambeko BEM, Susanto N, Alfanan A. Manual Handling as Contributor of Low Back Pain for Workers: A Case Study at PT Sumber Mandiri Jaya, Kabupaten Merauke. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2024; 13(1): 29-36. [DOI:10.20473/ijosh.v13i1.2024.29-36]
12. Daneau C, Tétreau C, Deroche T, Mainville C, Cantin V, Descarreaux M. Impact of load expectations on neuromuscular and postural strategies during a freestyle lifting task in individuals with and without chronic low back pain. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246791. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246791] [PMID]
13. Agostini V, Rimini D, Ghislieri M, Knaflitz M, Frola U, Trucco M. Muscle synergies in patients with low back pain: a statistical gait analysis study pre-and post-rehabilitation. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). IEEE. 2018: p. 1-6. [DOI:10.1109/MeMeA.2018.8438803]
14. Sambeko BEM, Susanto N, Alfanan A. Manual Handling as Contributor of Low Back Pain for Workers: A Case Study at PT Sumber Mandiri Jaya, Kabupaten Merauke. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2024; 13(1): 29-36. [DOI:10.20473/ijosh.v13i1.2024.29-36]
15. Anbarian M, Rajabian F, Ghasemi MH, Heidari Moghaddam R. The effect of the heel wedges on the electromyography activities of the selected lower back muscles during load lifting. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2017;5(3):12-21. [DOI:10.30699/jergon.5.3.12]
16. Faber GS, Kingma I, Bakker AJM, Van Dieën JH. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body. Journal of biomechanics. 2009; 42(1), 35-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.013] [PMID]
17. Ilbeigi S, Al-Eghabi M, Yousefi M, Hosseini MH. Muscular Synergy of Trunk and Hip Segments in Carrying Hand Loads with Different Weights in Healthy Young People . Iran J Ergon. 2024; 12(3): 192-200. [DOI:10.32592/IJE.12.3.192]
18. Medrano-Escalada Y, Plaza-Manzano G, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Valera-Calero JA. Structural, functional and neurochemical cortical brain changes associated with chronic low back pain. Tomography. 2022;8(5):2153-63. [DOI:10.3390/tomography8050180] [PMID]
19. Suehiro T, Ishida H, Kobara K, Osaka H, Watanabe S. Altered trunk muscle recruitment patterns during lifting in individuals in remission from recurrent low back pain. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2018;39:128-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.02.008] [PMID]
20. Halaki M, Ginn K. Normalization of EMG singals: to normalize or not to normalize and what to normalize to. In: Computational intelligence in electromyography analysis-A perspective on current applications and future challenges, InTech; 2012. [DOI:10.5772/49957]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |