Write your message
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2020)                   Iran J Ergon 2020, 8(3): 48-58 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahdavi N, Faradmal J, Dianat I, khotanlou H, Haidari Moghadam R. Investigating the Relationship Between the Risk of Psychosocial Factors and Grip Fatigue of Employees with Manual Tasks. Iran J Ergon 2020; 8 (3) :48-58
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-731-en.html
1- Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan university of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Hamadan University of medical sciencesDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan university of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Department of Computer Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
5- Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan university of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Dr_haidari@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6142 Views)
Backgrond and Aim: Fatigue is a common and highly prevalent problem among workers. Muscle fatigue is the result of general fatigue that is caused by different risk factors. This research was conducted to assess grip fatigue between workers with manual tasks and its relationship to psychosocial risk factors.
Methods: In this study, Jamar hydraulic dynamometer was used to investigate the decrease in the production of grip force or grip fatigue. The grip force of 157 subjects in three job levels that met inclusion criteria recorded, three times in an 8 hours shift. The psychosocial risk factors were also assessed using the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire and their relationship with grip force and grip fatigue was analyzed.
Results: sixty-one percent, 62%, and 69% of employees in light, medium, and heavy tasks, respectively, experienced grip fatigue in the second phase of the study. It seems that as the power/speed increased and the tasks became more difficult, employees experienced more grip fatigue in the right hand. The declining trend of grip force and the increase in grip fatigue was more evident in heavy task jobs. No moderate or strong correlation was observed between the psychosocial risk factors and grip fatigue.
Conclusion: Because the nature of worker tasks in heavy manual tasks required more force exertion, they experienced more grip fatigue in their right hand than other workers. It is not possible to draw definitive conclusions about the impact of psychosocial risk factors on grip fatigue. Investigating the impact of cognitive loads and anthropometric dimensions on grip fatigue can be an interesting topic for future studies.

Full-Text [PDF 597 kb]   (9509 Downloads) |   |   Extended Abstract (HTML)  (1473 Views)  
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/05/28 | Accepted: 2020/08/27 | ePublished: 2020/09/22

References
1. Edwards RHT. Human muscle function and fatigue. Ciba Found Symp. 1981; 82: 1-18. [DOI:10.1002/9780470715420.ch1] [PMID]
2. Bigland-Ritchie B, Cafarelli E, Vollestad NK. Fatigue of submaximal static contractions. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1986; 556: 137-148. [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Sargeant AJ. Human power output and muscle fatigue. Int J Sports Med. 1994; 15(3):116-121. [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1021031] [PMID]
4. Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Occupational biomechanics. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. [Book] [Google Scholar]
5. Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1997. [Article] [Google Scholar]
6. Takala E-P. Static muscular load, an increasing hazard in modern information technology. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002; 28(4): 211-213. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.667] [PMID]
7. Janssen N, Kant IJ, Swaen GMH, Janssen PPM, Schröer CAP. Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: Results from the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60(1): i71-76. [DOI:10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i71] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Chaffin DB. Localized muscle fatigue-definition and measurement. J Occup Environ Med. 1973; 15(4): 346-354. [Google Scholar]
9. Åhsberg E. Perceived fatigue related to work. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life; 1998. [Article] [Google Scholar]
10. Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14(1): 13-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015] [PMID]
11. Podniece Z, Heuvel S, Blatter B. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Prevention report. Bilbao, Spain: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2008. [Google Scholar]
12. Choobineh A, Movahed M, Tabatabaie SH, Kumashiro M. Perceived demands and musculoskeletal disorders in operating room nurses of Shiraz city hospitals. Ind Health. 2010; 48(1): 74-84. [DOI:10.2486/indhealth.48.74] [PMID]
13. Kajimoto O. Development of a method of evaluation of fatigue and its economic impacts. In: Watanabe Y, Evengård B, Natelson B, Jason L, Kuratsune H (eds.). Fatigue science for human health. New York: Springer; 2008: 33-46. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Ricci JA, Chee E, Lorandeau AL, Berger J. Fatigue in the US workforce: Prevalence and implications for lost productive work time. J Occup Environ Med. 2007 ;49(1): 1-10. [DOI:10.1097/01.jom.0000249782.60321.2a] [PMID]
15. Techera U, Hallowell M, Stambaugh N, Littlejohn R. Causes and consequences of occupational fatigue: Meta-Analysis and systems model. J Occup Environ Med. 2016; 58(1): 961-973. [DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000837] [PMID]
16. Barker LM, Nussbaum MA. The effects of fatigue on performance in simulated nursing work. Ergonomics. 2011; 54(9): 815-829. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2011.597878] [PMID]
17. Avin KG, Law LAF. Age-Related Differences in Muscle Fatigue Vary by Contraction Type: A Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(8): 1153-1165. [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100333] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Frey Law LA, Avin KG. Endurance time is joint-specific: A modelling and meta-analysis investigation. Ergonomics. 2010; 53(1): 109-129. [DOI:10.1080/00140130903389068] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Taylor JR, Twomey LT. Age changes in lumbar zygapophyseal joints: Observations on structure and function. Spine. 1986; 11(7): 739-745. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-198609000-00014] [PMID]
20. Hickey DS, Hukins DW. Relation between the structure of the annulus fibrosus and the function and failure of the intervertebral disc. Spine. 1980; 5(2): 106-116. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-198003000-00004] [PMID]
21. Kauppila LI, McAlindon T, Evans S, Wilson PW, Kiel D, Felson DT. Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta: A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine. 1997; 22(14): 1642-1647. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199707150-00023] [PMID]
22. Frankenhaeuser M, Johansson G. Stress at work: Psychobiological and psychosocial aspects 1. Appl Psychol. 1986; 35(3): 287-299. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1986.tb00928.x]
23. Wixted F, O'Sullivan L. The moderating role of end-tidal CO2 on upper trapezius muscle activity in response to sustained attention. Int J Ind Ergon. 2017; 61: 1-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2017.04.003]
24. Schleifer LM, Ley R, Spalding TW. A hyperventilation theory of job stress and musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002; 41(5): 420-432. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.10061] [PMID]
25. Mehta RK, Agnew MJ. Effects of physical and mental demands on shoulder muscle fatigue. Work. 2012; 41: 2897-2901. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-2012-0541-2897] [PMID]
26. Aptel M, Aublet-Cuvelier A, Cnockaert JC. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Joint Bone Spine. 2002; 69(6): 546-555. [DOI:10.1016/S1297-319X(02)00450-5]
27. Mehta RK, Nussbaum MA, Agnew MJ. Muscle-and task-dependent responses to concurrent physical and mental workload during intermittent static work. Ergonomics. 2012; 55(10): 1166-1179. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2012.703695] [PMID]
28. Schleifer LM, Spalding TW, Kerick SE, Cram JR, Ley R, Hatfield BD. Mental stress and trapezius muscle activation under psychomotor challenge: A focus on EMG gaps during computer work. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(3): 356-365. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00645.x] [PMID]
29. Deeney C, O'Sullivan LW. Effects of cognitive loading and force on upper trapezius fatigue. Occup Med. 2017; 67(9): 678-683. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqx157] [PMID]
30. Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2005; 31(6): 438-449. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.948] [PMID]
31. Aminian M, Dianat I, Miri A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. The Iranian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) for assessment of psychological risk factors at work. Heal Promot Perspect. 2017; 7(1):7-13. [DOI:10.15171/hpp.2017.03] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Windsor, Ontario: Human Kinetics; 1998. [Google Scholar]
33. Dedering Å, Németh G, Harms-Ringdahl K. Correlation between electromyographic spectral changes and subjective assessment of lumbar muscle fatigue in subjects without pain from the lower back. Clin Biomech. 1999; 14(2): 103-111. [DOI:10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00053-9]
34. Neely G, Ljunggren G, Sylven C, Borg G. Comparison between the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for the evaluation of leg exertion. Int J Sports Med. 1992; 13(2): 133-136. [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1021244] [PMID]
35. Hummel A, Läubli T, Pozzo M, Spillmann S, Kilpstein A. Relationship between perceived exertion and mean power frequency of the EMG signal from the upper trapezius muscle during isometric shoulder elevation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 95(4): 321-326. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-005-0014-7] [PMID]
36. Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, Hagberg M, Kilbom A, Kuorinka AI, et al. A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993; 19(2): 73-84. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.1494] [PMID]
37. Garg A, Hegmann KT, Schwoerer BJ, Kapellusch JM. The effect of maximum voluntary contraction on endurance times for the shoulder girdle. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002; 30(2): 103-113. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00078-1]
38. Sauter S, Moon SD. An ecological model of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. Beyond Biomech. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Press; 1996: 15-31. [DOI:10.1201/9781482272680-11]
39. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984; 9(2): 222-226. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-X]
40. Rostamzadeh S, Saremi M, Taheri F. Maximum handgrip strength as a function of type of work and hand-forearm dimensions. Work. 2020; 65(3): 679-687. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-203100] [PMID]
41. Boenzi F, Digiesi S, Facchini F, Mummolo G. Ergonomic improvement through job rotations in repetitive manual tasks in case of limited specialization and differentiated ergonomic requirements. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016; 49(12): 1667-1672. [DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.820]
42. Rhén I-M, Forsman M. Inter-and intra-rater reliability of the OCRA checklist method in video-recorded manual work tasks. Appl Ergon. 2020; 84: 103025. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103025] [PMID]
43. Benos L, Tsaopoulos D, Bochtis D. A review on ergonomics in agriculture. Part I: Manual operations. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(6): 1905. [DOI:10.3390/app10061905]
44. Whittaker RL, La Delfa NJ, Dickerson CR. Algorithmically detectable directional changes in upper extremity motion indicate substantial myoelectric shoulder muscle fatigue during a repetitive manual task. Ergonomics. 2019; 62(3): 431-443. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2018.1536808] [PMID]
45. Ranavolo A, Chini G, Silvetti A, Mari S, Serrao M, Draicchio F. Myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue in repetitive work detected by means of miniaturized sEMG sensors. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018; 24(3): 464-474. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2017.1357867] [PMID]
46. Musalek C, Kirchengast S. Grip strength as an Indicator of Health-related quality of life in old age-a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(12): 1447. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph14121447] [PMID] [PMCID]
47. Mendes J, Afonso C, Moreira P, Padrão P, Santos A, Borges N, et al. Association of anthropometric and nutrition status indicators with hand grip strength and gait speed in older adults. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2019; 43(3): 347-356. [DOI:10.1002/jpen.1424] [PMID]
48. Thompson BJ. Does work-induced fatigue accumulate across three compressed 12 hour shifts in hospital nurses and aides? PLoS One. 2019; 14(2): e0211715. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211715] [PMID] [PMCID]
49. Walker-Bone K, D'Angelo S, Syddall HE, Palmer KT, Cooper C, Coggon D, et al. Heavy manual work throughout the working lifetime and muscle strength among men at retirement age. Occup Env Med. 2016; 73(4): 284-286. [DOI:10.1136/oemed-2015-103293] [PMID] [PMCID]
50. Mantooth WP, Mehta RK, Rhee J, Cavuoto LA. Task and sex differences in muscle oxygenation during handgrip fatigue development. Ergonomics. 2018; 61(12): 1646-1656. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2018.1504991] [PMID]
51. Chang F-L, Sun Y-M, Chuang K-H, Hsu D-J. Work fatigue and physiological symptoms in different occupations of high-elevation construction workers. Appl Ergon. 2009; 40(4): 591-596. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.017] [PMID]
52. Jasper I, Häußler A, Baur B, Marquardt Ch, Hermsdorfer J. Circadian variations in the kinematics of handwriting and grip strength. Chronobiol Int. 2009; 26(3): 576-594. [DOI:10.1080/07420520902896590] [PMID]
53. Jewett ME, Wyatt JK, Ritz‐De Cecco A, Khalsa SB, Dijk DJ, Czeisler CA. Time course of sleep inertia dissipation in human performance and alertness. J Sleep Res. 1999; 8(1): 1-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2869.1999.00128.x] [PMID]
54. Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int J Ind Ergon. 2005; 35(7): 605-618. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.007]
55. Roman-Liu D, Tokarski T, Kowalewski R. Decrease of force capabilities as an index of upper limb fatigue. Ergonomics. 2005; 48: 930-948. [DOI:10.1080/00140130500182312] [PMID]
56. Hong Y, Li J-X, Fong D-TP. Effect of prolonged walking with backpack loads on trunk muscle activity and fatigue in children. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008; 18(6): 990-996. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.013] [PMID]
57. Enoka RM, Baudry S, Rudroff T, Farina D, Klass M, Duchateau J. Unraveling the neurophysiology of muscle fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011; 21(2): 208-219. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.10.006] [PMID]
58. Dederinga A, Nkmeth G, Harms-Ringdahl K. Correlation between electromyographic spectral changes and subjective assessment of lumbar muscle fatigue in subjects without pain from the lower back. Clin Biomech. 1999; 14(2): 103-111. [DOI:10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00053-9]
59. Bosch T, De Looze MP, Van Dieen JH. Development of fatigue and discomfort in the upper trapezius muscle during light manual work. Ergonomics. 2007; 50(2): 161-177. [DOI:10.1080/00140130600900282] [PMID]
60. Robertson RJ, Stanko RT, Goss FL, Spina RJ, Greenawalt KD. Blood glucose extraction as a mediator of perceived exertion during prolonged exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990; 61(1-2): 100-105. [DOI:10.1007/BF00236701] [PMID]
61. Bazazan A, Dianat I, Rastgoo L, Zandi H. Relationships between dimensions of fatigue and psychological distress among public hospital nurses. Heal Promot Perspect. 2018; 8(3): 195-99. [DOI:10.15171/hpp.2018.26] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |