Write your message
Volume 7, Issue 3 (Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2019)                   Iran J Ergon 2019, 7(3): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Merrikhpour Z, Sohrabi M S. Safety Status of Children's Playground Equipment: A Case Study in Hamaedan Luna Park. Iran J Ergon 2019; 7 (3) :1-10
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-663-en.html
1- MSc, Industrial Design Department, Art and Architecture Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran , zahra_merrikhpour@yahoo.com
2- MSc, Department of Industrial Design, School of Architecture and Urban Design, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 513 kb]   (10635 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (6905 Views)

According to this paper’s report, given the undeniable role of the safety of playground equipment in preventing possible harm to children, they must be secured and adapted to global standards.


Extended Abstract:   (2018 Views)
Introduction

Given the importance of playing in shaping the personality of children, playgrounds should be designed to encourage their presence in these spaces [2]. Playgrounds are public places for the effective education of children, helping them to better understand social rules and control their emotions. Playgrounds play an important role in the development of children's communities and their physical skills. If these spaces are based on safety standards, they can contribute to the better social and physical development of children. While playgrounds are a major source of entertainment for children of all ages, their equipment is a major threat to users' health [1, 2]. Despite all the efforts to reduce injuries, approximately 7,000 children are injured in the United States annually who in result need hospital care [2]. Activities and equipment such as falling at 5.5%, climbing equipment at 32%, sliders at 29% and swings at 26% have been identified as the main cause of these injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety status of children's playground equipment in Hamadan’s parks according to the standards of the American Product Safety Commission.

 

Materials and Methods

The present study was a cross-sectional study carried out in spring 2019 in Hamadan. This research has been conducted by studying the existing international standards for children's playground equipment by observing, photographing and measuring the basic playground equipment including seasaw, swing and all kinds of slides (straight, spiral and combined). Finally, the safety status of the equipment under study was complied with the US Product Safety Commission standard.
The People's Park of Hamadan is one of the oldest child parks in the province, with more than 40 years old and about 15 hectares, located in the research intersection of Hamadan. On average during the overcrowded hours of the day (10:30 am till 12 pm and 5:30-8 pm), about 60 children play on the playground simultaneously. The playground area on the north side of the park is approximately 40 meters by 30 meters with total equipment including 3 double swings (6 swings in total), 5 sewsaws, 3 single sliders and 7 combined sliders (5 straight slider, 3 spiral sliders and 4 combined sliders) (Figure 1).


Figure 1. Schematic map of swing (top right), sliders (top left) and seasaw


 

Results

The results showed that among the main playground equipment, the spiral slide has the highest ratio of 76.1% and the seesaws with 25% minimum compliance with the CPSC standard. Among the most commonly problems in this field the non-standard design of play equipment, incorrect assembly, installation and placement in use zones can be pointed (Tables 1-6).
 

Table 1. Comparison of the status of the standard seesaws with US Product Safety Commission standards

Row
Standard status Observed sample status Matching the standards
  1.           
     The swing should not be at risk of falling.           The slope facing the handle may result in the risk of falling at high altitude     
     No     
  1.      
Bumping materials such as part of a tire, etc. must be mounted on the floor below the seat to prevent sudden impacts to the child's body and to the limbs between the seat and the ground The metal base embedded in the lower part of the seat over time causes the polyurethane foam to bore underneath and the bumping action is not performed correctly
Yes
The maximum angle created between the main axis of the swing bar and the horizon line must be 25 degrees. The maximum angle is about 35 degrees.
No
No pedestal should be used for the design of these types of joints The sample has no pedestals.
Yes

Table 2. Comparison of Platform Status of Three Straight, Spiral and Combined sliders with US Product Safety Commission Standards

Row
Standard status Observed sample status Matching the standards
1.
 
For children under five years of age with a minimum depth of 47.5 cm and for children over five years of age with a depth of 35 cm. Depth equal to 70 cm in all three types Yes
2. Be completely horizontal (slope of + and - 2 degrees is acceptable). With a standard slope Yes
3. There should be no gap between the end of the platform and the beginning of the slope, which may include a part of the child's body. * It has a wide gap  
­ No
4. The platform entrance should be designed in a way to minimize the number of children applying the device. No significant design has been done in this area. No
5. Have a minimum width equal to the slope. Width equal to slope slip Yes
6. Surrounded by guardrails and obstacles. Surrounded by a guardrail at a height of 90 cm Yes
7. Have a handle, a fence or anything else that encourages children to take it in order to make it easy to switch from standing to sitting. The factor is missing. No
8. The height of the platform above the ground for children under five should not exceed 80 cm. The platform height is 70 cm. Yes

* Many children suffer serious injuries and even death as a result of having their clothing slipped off and falling from a height.


Table 3. Comparing the Slippery slope with US Product Safety Commission standards

Row
Standard
Sample status as observed Compliance with standards
1. It should have edges at least 10 cm high along the slope. It has 10 cm edges along the way Match
2. The side edges of the slide should not be at any distance to the slide. The edges have no slippery slope. Match
3. The slide should be designed seamlessly and without any spacing between the different parts. Integrating the slope body of all three types of slides. Match
4. The horizontal size of the pit in slides that have an open pit with a circular, semicircular or curved cross-section, should be 20 cm for toddlers, 30 cm for preschool children, and 40 cm for preschool children. In the current example, this size is 30 cm for toddlers and 30cm for straight and combined slides for adult children and only in spiral sliders it equaled to 40 cm within the standard range. Spiral slider match;
Straight and combined slides do not match.
5. For children under five, the average slope should not be more than 24 degrees.
For children over the age of five, the average slope should not exceed 30 degrees.
The slope for children under 5 years of age was 25 degrees and 27 for children over five years of age. Not suitable for children under five.
Suitable for children over five.
6. For children under five years of age, no slider shall have a slope of more than 30 degrees.
For children over the age of five, no cross-section of the slide should be more than 50 degrees sloping.
All slides have an average 35 degree slope. Not suitable for children under five.
Suitable for children over five.


Table 4. Comparison of Slope Exit Point Situation of Three Types of Straight, Spiral and Combined sliders with US Product Safety Commission Standards

Row
Standard
Sample status as observed Compliance with standards
1. Have an angle of zero to 4 degree relative to the parallel line of the earth. With Standard angle Match
2. The edges of the outlet have curves to prevent ruptures and injuries such as those caused by sharp, angled edges. With Curved edges Match
3. For children under the age of five, the slope should be 17.5-25 cm and for children over five years should equal to 27.5 cm. For children under five years in three types of slides, this value is 40 cm, and for children over five years in straight and combined slides is 45 cm, and in the spiral slider it is 15 cm. Does not match


Table 5. Comparison of single-axis swing status in People's Park with American Safety Commission standards

Row
Standard
Sample status as observed Compliance with standards
All equipment used to secure suspended sections attached to the rocking chair and supporting structure shall not be easily removable or replaceable without the use of tools. The connections are secure and require specialized tools to open them
Match
If the S-shaped hook is used to attach the swing to the main structure or rocking chair, the mouth should be completely closed (preventing children from wearing them and causing possible injuries) The distances and angles of the joints used in the structure result in the child being injured or tears children's clothing Does not match
Swings should be suspended from the highest point of attachment to prevent children from climbing the structure. The swings are suspended from the highest point of connection
Match
Avoid placing horizontal bars in the middle of a-shaped frames. The current sample frame is U-shaped and has a horizontal bar in the middle Does not match
The use of fabric ropes is not recommended due to the loss of quality over time. All chains used are metal
Match
To avoid the potential risk of children inadvertently running in front of the swing and causing injury, the swing should be kept away from other playground equipment One swings shared some space with a combined slider Does not match
In order to minimize the potential hazards that may arise from moving or colliding with children, it is recommended that no more than two swings be installed on one structure. There are two twists installed on each structure
Match
Twists should not be attached to composite structures. The main structure is made of iron metal
Match
The swing’s chair should be designed to accommodate no more than one person. It is not possible to mount more than one person on the swing
Match
In order to reduce injuries, lightweight materials such as plastics and tires are replaced with wood and metal in the construction of chairs The seat is made of high density polyethylene plastic
Match
The seating edges should have a slight curvature. The sitting edges have curves
Match


Table 6. Percentage of People's Park Compliance with American Safety Commission Standards

Row Type of playground equipment Match Percentage
       1. Seesaw 25
Direct slider 63.6
Mixed slider 63.6
Single-axis swing 72.8
Spiral slider 76.1


 

Discussion & Conclusion

Currently, numerous US and European standards for the safety of gaming equipment have been formulated in developed countries. The research conducted in this study was based on the comprehensiveness of American standards and the provision of safety guidelines for the design, manufacture, installation and maintenance of equipment based on this standard. Of course, considering the anthropomorphic, racial, and especially behavioral differences of Iranian children, developing standards that are appropriate to the needs of Iranian children can provide a more accurate and comprehensive view of the subject.
This study showed that due to the undeniable role of the safety of playground equipment in the extent of the potential harm to children, they should be made more secure and in compliance with world standards and continuous control of existing safety equipment seems necessary.


 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all those who assisted in the writing of this article.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.


 

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2019/10/9 | Accepted: 2020/01/1 | ePublished: 2020/01/12

References
1. Naeini HS, Lindqvist K, Jafari HR, Mirlohi AH, Dalal K. Playground injuries in children. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2011; 2:61. [DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S14487] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Roderick LM. The ergonomics of children in playground equipment safety. Journal of Safety Research. 2004; 3:249-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2004.05.001] [PMID]
3. Amouzegar Z, Naeini HS, Jafari R. Design principle of playgrounds' equipments and spaces for children: An interaction education approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2):1968-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.265]
4. Tan N, Ang A, Heng D, Chen J, Wong H. Evaluation of playground injuries based on ICD, E codes, international Classification Of External Cause Of Injury codes (ICECI), and abbreviated injury scale coding systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2007; 19(1):18-27. [DOI:10.1177/10105395070190010501] [PMID]
5. Loder RT. The demographics of playground equipment injuries in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2008; 43(4):691-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.061] [PMID]
6. Norton C, Nixon J, Sibert JR. Playground injuries to children. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2004; 89(2):103-8. [DOI:10.1136/adc.2002.013045] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Nixon J, Acton C, Wallis B, Ballesteros MF, Battistutta D. Injury and frequency of use of playground equipment in public schools and parks in Brisbane, Australia. Injury Prevention. 2003; 9(3):210-3. [DOI:10.1136/ip.9.3.210] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. S.Naeini H, Jafari HR, Salehi E, Mirlouhi Falavarjani AH. Child safety in parks' playgrounds (a case study in Tehran's sub-district parks). Iran Occupational Health Journal. 2010; 7(3):37-47.
9. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. A Handbook for Public Playground Safety: General guidelines for new and existing playgrounds. Maryland: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; 1981.
10. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Public playground safety handbook. Maryland: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; 2008.
11. BS EN 1177:2018 Impact attenuating playground surfacing. Methods of test for determination of impact attenuation. 2018.
12. BS EN 1176-1:2017 Playground equipment and surfacing. General safety requirements and test methods. 2017.
13. ASTM F1487 - 17 Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Playground Equipment for Public Use. 2017.
14. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Handbook for Public Playground Safety. Maryland: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; 2006.
15. Fiissel D, Pattison G, Howard A. Severity of playground fractures: play equipment versus standing height falls. Injury Prevention. 2005; 11(6):337-9. [DOI:10.1136/ip.2005.009167] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Nowakowski P, Charytonowicz J. Ergonomic design of children's play spaces in the urban environment. international conference on universal access in human-computer interaction. Berlin: Springer; 2007. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-73281-5_55]
17. Tuckel P, Milczarski W, Silverman DG. Injuries caused by falls from playground equipment in the United States. Clinical Pediatrics. 2018; 57(5):563-73. [DOI:10.1177/0009922817732618] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |